[Intel-gfx] [maintainer-tools RFC PATCH] drm-intel: Link to .html instead of .rst

[Rodrigo Vivi]

Ideally .rst would referrence .rst with :ref:`` but since
these documentation are different repository we cannot link
like this. However I believe the main usage is through the
compiled html pages and since we already reference another
.html here I believe we should use our daily compiled doc.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
---
 drm-intel.rst | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drm-intel.rst b/drm-intel.rst
index 5dcb7d8..fa1e9bc 100644
--- a/drm-intel.rst
+++ b/drm-intel.rst
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ the appropriate branches.
 
 If possible, the commit message should also contain a Fixes: tag as described in
 `Documentation/process/submitting-patches
-<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_
+  <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_
 to aid the maintainers in identifying the right branch.
 
 Requesting Fixes Cherry-Pick Afterwards
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ It's not uncommon for a patch to have been committed before it's identified as a
 fix needing to be backported.
 
 If the patch is already in Linus' tree, please follow `stable kernel rules
-<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst>`_.
+<https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/stable-kernel-rules.html>`_.
 
 Otherwise, send an email to intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org and
 drm-intel-fixes at lists.freedesktop.org containing the subject of the patch, the
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ An inexhaustive list of details to check:
 
 * The patch conforms to `Documentation/process/submitting-patches
 
-  <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_
+  <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_
 
 * The commit message is sensible, and includes adequate details and references.
 
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ On Confidence, Complexity, and Transparency
 
 * Reviewed-by. All patches must be reviewed, no exceptions. Please see
   "Reviewer's statement of oversight" in `Documentation/process/submitting-patches
-  <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_
+  <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_
   and `review training
   <http://blog.ffwll.ch/2014/08/review-training-slides.html>`_.
 
-- 
1.9.1