[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Emit a user level message when resetting the GPU (or engine)

Michel Thierry michel.thierry at intel.com
Mon Jul 10 15:11:32 UTC 2017


On 7/10/2017 7:20 AM, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> 
>> Although a banned context will be told to -EIO off if they try to submit
>> more requests, we have a discrepancy between whole device resets and
>> per-engine resets where we report the GPU reset but not the engine
>> resets. This leaves a bit of mystery as to why the context was banned,
>> and also reduces awareness overall of when a GPU (engine) reset occurs
>> with its possible side-effects.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 8 +++++---
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> index d3076a74c17e..dde5783b8f80 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> @@ -1865,9 +1865,10 @@ void i915_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   	if (!i915_gem_unset_wedged(dev_priv))
>>   		goto wakeup;
>>   
>> +	dev_notice(dev_priv->drm.dev,
>> +		   "Resetting chip after gpu hang\n");
>>   	error->reset_count++;
>>   
>> -	pr_notice("drm/i915: Resetting chip after gpu hang\n");
>>   	disable_irq(dev_priv->drm.irq);
>>   	ret = i915_gem_reset_prepare(dev_priv);
>>   	if (ret) {
>> @@ -1945,7 +1946,9 @@ int i915_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>   
>>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!test_bit(I915_RESET_ENGINE + engine->id, &error->flags));
>>   
>> -	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("resetting %s\n", engine->name);
>> +	dev_notice(engine->i915->drm.dev,
>> +		   "Resetting %s after gpu hang\n", engine->name);
>> +	error->reset_engine_count[engine->id]++;
>>
> 
> Even tho no mention, this is now in symmetry with reset to count
> attempts not successes.
>

True, originally I saw it as a way to prevent counting twice if there 
were issues and promoted to full-reset. But it is also good to behave 
the same as chip reset.

Acked-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>

> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> 
> 
>>   	active_request = i915_gem_reset_prepare_engine(engine);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(active_request)) {
>> @@ -1978,7 +1981,6 @@ int i915_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto out;
>>   
>> -	error->reset_engine_count[engine->id]++;
>>   out:
>>   	i915_gem_reset_finish_engine(engine);
>>   	return ret;
>> -- 
>> 2.13.2


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list