[Intel-gfx] [maintainer-tools RFC PATCH] drm-intel: Link to .html instead of .rst

[Vivi, Rodrigo]

On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 13:29 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> > Ideally .rst would referrence .rst with :ref:`` but since
> > these documentation are different repository we cannot link
> > like this. However I believe the main usage is through the
> > compiled html pages and since we already reference another
> > .html here I believe we should use our daily compiled doc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> 
> As I wrote in my other mail, I think this is better.

> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>

could I just squash, keep the ack and merge?

> 
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  drm-intel.rst | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drm-intel.rst b/drm-intel.rst
> > index 5dcb7d8..fa1e9bc 100644
> > --- a/drm-intel.rst
> > +++ b/drm-intel.rst
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ the appropriate branches.
> >  
> >  If possible, the commit message should also contain a Fixes: tag as described in
> >  `Documentation/process/submitting-patches
> > -<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_
> > +  <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_
> >  to aid the maintainers in identifying the right branch.
> >  
> >  Requesting Fixes Cherry-Pick Afterwards
> > @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ It's not uncommon for a patch to have been committed before it's identified as a
> >  fix needing to be backported.
> >  
> >  If the patch is already in Linus' tree, please follow `stable kernel rules
> > -<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst>`_.
> > +<https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/stable-kernel-rules.html>`_.
> >  
> >  Otherwise, send an email to intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org and
> >  drm-intel-fixes at lists.freedesktop.org containing the subject of the patch, the
> > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ An inexhaustive list of details to check:
> >  
> >  * The patch conforms to `Documentation/process/submitting-patches
> >  
> > -  <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_
> > +  <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_
> >  
> >  * The commit message is sensible, and includes adequate details and references.
> >  
> > @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ On Confidence, Complexity, and Transparency
> >  
> >  * Reviewed-by. All patches must be reviewed, no exceptions. Please see
> >    "Reviewer's statement of oversight" in `Documentation/process/submitting-patches
> > -  <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>`_
> > +  <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/submitting-patches.html>`_
> >    and `review training
> >    <http://blog.ffwll.ch/2014/08/review-training-slides.html>`_.
>