[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/hsw+: Add has_fuses power well attribute
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Jul 11 17:37:24 UTC 2017
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:22:19PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:05:39PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 05:40:37PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > The pattern of a power well backing a set of fuses whose initialization
> > > we need to wait for during power well enabling is common to all GEN9+
> > > platforms. Adding support for this to the HSW power well enable helper
> > > allows us to use the HSW/BDW power well code for GEN9+ as well in a
> > > follow-up patch.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/display.c | 6 +++---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 ++++----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/display.c
> > > index 2deb05f..13599bb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/display.c
> > > @@ -178,9 +178,9 @@ static void emulate_monitor_status_change(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> > > SDE_PORTE_HOTPLUG_SPT);
> > > vgpu_vreg(vgpu, SKL_FUSE_STATUS) |=
> > > SKL_FUSE_DOWNLOAD_STATUS |
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG0_DIST_STATUS |
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG1_DIST_STATUS |
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG2_DIST_STATUS;
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(0) |
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(1) |
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(2);
> > > vgpu_vreg(vgpu, LCPLL1_CTL) |=
> > > LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE |
> > > LCPLL_PLL_LOCK;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > index dc5ca5a..9e97536 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > @@ -1396,6 +1396,7 @@ struct i915_power_well {
> > > u32 irq_pipe_mask;
> > > /* The pw is backing the VGA functionality */
> > > bool has_vga:1;
> > > + bool has_fuses:1;
> > > } hsw;
> > > };
> > > const struct i915_power_well_ops *ops;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > index 845f50c..794d65c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > @@ -8023,10 +8023,10 @@ enum {
> > >
> > > /* SKL Fuse Status */
> > > #define SKL_FUSE_STATUS _MMIO(0x42000)
> > > -#define SKL_FUSE_DOWNLOAD_STATUS (1<<31)
> > > -#define SKL_FUSE_PG0_DIST_STATUS (1<<27)
> > > -#define SKL_FUSE_PG1_DIST_STATUS (1<<26)
> > > -#define SKL_FUSE_PG2_DIST_STATUS (1<<25)
> > > +#define SKL_FUSE_DOWNLOAD_STATUS (1<<31)
> > > +/* PG0 (HW control->no power well ID), PG1..PG2 (SKL_DISP_PW1..SKL_DISP_PW2) */
> > > +#define SKL_PW_TO_PG(pw) ((pw) - SKL_DISP_PW_1 + 1)
> > > +#define SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(pg) (1 << (27 - (pg)))
> > >
> > > /* Per-pipe DDI Function Control */
> > > #define _TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_A 0x60400
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > > index 14d4ff4..c204be0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > > @@ -400,16 +400,36 @@ static void hsw_wait_for_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > !!(reqs & 1), !!(reqs & 2), !!(reqs & 4), !!(reqs & 8));
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void gen9_wait_for_power_well_fuses(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > + int pg)
> > > +{
> > > + /* Timeout 5us for PG#0, for other PGs 1us */
> > > + WARN_ON(intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, SKL_FUSE_STATUS,
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(pg),
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(pg), 1));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void hsw_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > > {
> > > enum i915_power_well_id id = power_well->id;
> > > + bool wait_fuses = power_well->hsw.has_fuses;
> > > + int pg;
> > > u32 val;
> > >
> > > + if (wait_fuses) {
> > > + pg = SKL_PW_TO_PG(id);
> > > + if (pg == 1)
> > > + gen9_wait_for_power_well_fuses(dev_priv, pg - 1);
> > > + }
> >
> > This part looks magicy. The macro adds 1, but here you have to subtract
> > 1 when feeding it the value, which seems odd.
>
> That one maps PG1 to PW1, PG2 to PW2 etc.
Would be perhaps better to replace the raw numbers with a PG enum or
something. Or maybe just pass around the power well IDs instead and
keep the PG numbers hidden from view.
>
> > And apparently 1 is somehow special, but I can't tell why.
>
> For power well 1 we need to wait both for fuses in PG#0 before enabling
> and fuses in PG#1 after enabling the power well. For all other power
> wells we only need to wait for the fuses in the corresponding PG after
> enabling. I could add a comment to clarify this.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > val = I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER);
> > > I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER, val | HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(id));
> > > hsw_wait_for_power_well_enable(dev_priv, power_well);
> > >
> > > + if (wait_fuses)
> > > + gen9_wait_for_power_well_fuses(dev_priv, pg);
> > > +
> > > hsw_power_well_post_enable(dev_priv, power_well->hsw.irq_pipe_mask,
> > > power_well->hsw.has_vga);
> > > }
> > > @@ -810,15 +830,15 @@ static void skl_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > case SKL_DISP_PW_1:
> > > if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> > > SKL_FUSE_STATUS,
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG0_DIST_STATUS,
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG0_DIST_STATUS,
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(0),
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(0),
> > > 1)) {
> > > DRM_ERROR("PG0 not enabled\n");
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > break;
> > > case SKL_DISP_PW_2:
> > > - if (!(fuse_status & SKL_FUSE_PG1_DIST_STATUS)) {
> > > + if (!(fuse_status & SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(1))) {
> > > DRM_ERROR("PG1 in disabled state\n");
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > @@ -863,15 +883,15 @@ static void skl_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > if (power_well->id == SKL_DISP_PW_1) {
> > > if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> > > SKL_FUSE_STATUS,
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG1_DIST_STATUS,
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG1_DIST_STATUS,
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(1),
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(1),
> > > 1))
> > > DRM_ERROR("PG1 distributing status timeout\n");
> > > } else if (power_well->id == SKL_DISP_PW_2) {
> > > if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> > > SKL_FUSE_STATUS,
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG2_DIST_STATUS,
> > > - SKL_FUSE_PG2_DIST_STATUS,
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(2),
> > > + SKL_FUSE_PG_DIST_STATUS(2),
> > > 1))
> > > DRM_ERROR("PG2 distributing status timeout\n");
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list