[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/i915: prepare pipe for YCBCR420 output
Sharma, Shashank
shashank.sharma at intel.com
Sat Jul 15 04:45:07 UTC 2017
Regards
Shashank
On 7/15/2017 12:03 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:03:17PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote:
>> To get HDMI YCBCR420 output, the PIPEMISC register should be
>> programmed to:
>> - Generate YCBCR output (bit 11)
>> - In case of YCBCR420 outputs, it should be programmed in full
>> blend mode to use the scaler in 5x3 ratio (bits 26 and 27)
>>
>> This patch:
>> - Adds definition of these bits.
>> - Programs PIPEMISC for YCBCR420 outputs.
>>
>> V2: rebase
>> V3: rebase
>> V4: rebase
>> V5: added r-b from Ander
>> V6: Handle only YCBCR420 outputs (ville)
>> V7: rebase
>>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2 at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2 at gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 7 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index c712d01..e5020d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -5227,6 +5227,9 @@ enum {
>>
>> #define _PIPE_MISC_A 0x70030
>> #define _PIPE_MISC_B 0x71030
>> +#define PIPEMISC_YCBCR420_ENABLE (1<<27)
>> +#define PIPEMISC_YCBCR420_MODE_BLEND (1<<26)
>> +#define PIPEMISC_OUTPUT_YCBCR (1<<11)
> Please rename to match spec. So something like:
> PIPEMISC_YUV420_ENABLE (1<<27)
> PIPEMISC_YUV420_MODE_FULL_BLEND (1<<26)
> PIPEMISC_OUTPUT_COLORSPACE_YUV (1<<11)
got it.
>> #define PIPEMISC_DITHER_BPC_MASK (7<<5)
>> #define PIPEMISC_DITHER_8_BPC (0<<5)
>> #define PIPEMISC_DITHER_10_BPC (1<<5)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index d78f1c2..1a23ec0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -8076,6 +8076,7 @@ static void haswell_set_pipemisc(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->dev);
>> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
>> + struct intel_crtc_state *config = intel_crtc->config;
>>
>> if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 9) {
>> u32 val = 0;
>> @@ -8101,6 +8102,12 @@ static void haswell_set_pipemisc(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>> if (intel_crtc->config->dither)
>> val |= PIPEMISC_DITHER_ENABLE | PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_SP;
>>
>> + if (config->ycbcr420) {
>> + val |= PIPEMISC_OUTPUT_YCBCR |
>> + PIPEMISC_YCBCR420_ENABLE |
>> + PIPEMISC_YCBCR420_MODE_BLEND;
>> + }
> I think we'll want two flags. One to specify whether we're outputting
> YCbCr and the other to indicate whether we need the 4:2:0 subsamling.
> So maybe something like
> bool ycbcr;
> bool ycbcr420;
This would have been true if we were support YCBCR444/422/420 all, but
the recent patch series only
supports 420, so if its ycbcr its ycbcr420. We might be able to add
preference of a 420_also mode in case
of RGB Vs YCBCR420, by adding another property.
> We also need state readout for this stuff. With those two flags I think
> we can do something like:
>
> if (IS_BDW || GEN >= 9) {
> tmp = READ(PIPEMISC);
>
> crtc_state->ycbcr = tmp & OUTPUT_YUV;
We dont support YCBCR (apart from 420) anymore, as there is no HDMI
output property.
So this doesn't look required.
>
> if (IS_GLK || GEN >= 10)
> crtc_state->ycbcr420 = tmp & YUV420_ENABLE;
Yes, this is a great suggestion, and I believe I was missing this. Thanks !
> }
>
> The other missing readout thing is adjustment of the clock.
> ddi_dotclock_get() will need to double the dotclock when we're
> outputting ycbcr420.
>
> Pls also add something along the lines of
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ycbcr: %i, ycbcr420: %i\n", ...);
> to intel_dump_pipe_config() so that we can actually tell when we're
> outputting YCbCr and 4:2:0.
Thanks, this is also what I was looking for.
- Shashank
>
>> +
>> I915_WRITE(PIPEMISC(intel_crtc->pipe), val);
>> }
>> }
>> --
>> 2.7.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list