[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/1] chamelium: Add support for VGA frame comparison testing

[Lyude Paul]

Hey! The only changes I need on this is the small fix I mentioned for
patch #2, and a nitpick regarding the spellings being used for the
functions. I wasn't sure whether or not we should be using analog or
analogue (us spelling vs. everyone else) but apparently the answer is
to use the US spellings:

13:15 <Lyude> hm, weird question: what nationality's english spellings
do we actually prefer for igt functions? like, would it be
igt_check_analogue_frame_match() or igt_check_analog_frame_match(), or
does no one really care?
13:16 → DottorLeo (~leonardo at net-93-151-90-55.cust.dsl.teletu.it) has
joined #intel-gfx
13:18 <Lyude> mupuf: ^ ?
13:19 <mupuf> oh dear
13:19 <mupuf> danvet: ^
13:20 <danvet> I think personally I do us spelling in functions, and
something more british in comments
13:20 <dmlloyd> "nondigital"
13:20 <Lyude> hehe
13:20 <Lyude> alright gotcha, thanks!

On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 16:26 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> I am only sending this for comments at this point, since this will
> need 
> to be reworked according to the changes made on previous series
> still 
> under review. Especially, it will benefit from making the frame save 
> mechanism common.
>