[Intel-gfx] [RFC 10/14] drm/i915: Wrap context schedule notification

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

No functional change just something which will be handy in the
following patch.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 699868d81de8..89aa29f23a92 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -307,6 +307,18 @@ execlists_context_status_change(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq,
 				   status, rq);
 }
 
+static inline void
+execlists_context_schedule_in(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
+{
+	execlists_context_status_change(rq, INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_IN);
+}
+
+static inline void
+execlists_context_schedule_out(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
+{
+	execlists_context_status_change(rq, INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_OUT);
+}
+
 static void
 execlists_update_context_pdps(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt, u32 *reg_state)
 {
@@ -352,7 +364,7 @@ static void execlists_submit_ports(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		if (rq) {
 			GEM_BUG_ON(count > !n);
 			if (!count++)
-				execlists_context_status_change(rq, INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_IN);
+				execlists_context_schedule_in(rq);
 			port_set(&port[n], port_pack(rq, count));
 			desc = execlists_update_context(rq);
 			GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(port[n].context_id = upper_32_bits(desc));
@@ -603,8 +615,7 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
 			if (--count == 0) {
 				GEM_BUG_ON(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED);
 				GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(rq));
-				execlists_context_status_change(rq, INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_OUT);
-
+				execlists_context_schedule_out(rq);
 				trace_i915_gem_request_out(rq);
 				i915_gem_request_put(rq);
 
-- 
2.9.4