[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v5 0/7] CRC testing with Chamelium improvements

[Paul Kocialkowski]

On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 14:41 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Paul Kocialkowski
> <paul.kocialkowski at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 12:39 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > For future reference, please post new versions of the entire
> > > series as
> > > new threads. When posting new versions of just some individual
> > > patches,
> > > in-reply-to each patch being replaced is fine. I think this is
> > > more
> > > clear, and also gives patchwork a better chance to apply the right
> > > patches for testing (not that it does igt CI, but that might
> > > change).
> > 
> > Quoting Lyude from an earlier exchange:
> >  * When you're doing a new revision of a patch series, it's helpful
> > to
> >    keep it in the same email thread as the original v1 so it's
> > easier
> >    to keep track of in people's mail clients (as well as avoiding
> >    accidentally reviewing older patch versions.
> > 
> > I actually prefer it your way (posting as new threads), so I suppose
> > I'll do that in the future, if Lyude doesn't have any strong
> > objection
> > about it.
> 
> Yeah, new patch series = new thread, otherwise patchwork doesn't pick
> it up. I know that some people like to in-reply-to the previous thread
> to link stuff up, but that doesn't work with patchwork and CI.

Nice, glad to hear it!

> Another reason why mailing lists aren't awesome, but that's what we're
> stuck with for now.

Frankly, I love mailing lists, in comparison to anything web-based that
basically kills my workflow and cannot be used offline.

-- 
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski at linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo, Finland