[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/37] drm/exynos: Drop drm_vblank_cleanup
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Jun 1 09:44:11 UTC 2017
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:15:13PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
>
>
> 2017년 05월 31일 17:45에 Daniel Vetter 이(가) 쓴 글:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 09:03:34AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> 2017년 05월 24일 23:51에 Daniel Vetter 이(가) 쓴 글:
> >>> Only in the load failure path, where the hardware is quiet anyway.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com>
> >>> Cc: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim at samsung.com>
> >>> Cc: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim at samsung.com>
> >>> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 4 +---
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> >>> index 50294a7bd29d..1c814b9342af 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> >>> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> >>> /* Probe non kms sub drivers and virtual display driver. */
> >>> ret = exynos_drm_device_subdrv_probe(drm);
> >>> if (ret)
> >>> - goto err_cleanup_vblank;
> >>> + goto err_unbind_all;
> >>
> >> With this change shouldn't you post the patch to remove drm_vblank_init and setup vblank stuff in drm_crtc_init together?
> >> I couldn't find the relevant patch on your patch series[1].
> >
> > No, drm_vblank_cleanup is already called in the core. The only reason to
> > call it in the driver is to fall back from kms to ums when irq setup
> > somehow failed, then you need to disable vblank support again.
> >
> > The only driver which ever needed this was radeon, and radeon long ago
> > lost ums support. drm_vblank_cleanup is already called for you, and most
> > drivers don't even do this cleanup call. But somehow a lot of people
> > copied from radeon without understanding what it does.
> >
> > Looking at the last patch in this series might help a bit in understanding
> > the history here. Can you pls reevaluate the patch?
>
>
> Thanks for explaination. Confirmed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com>
Thanks for the review, patch applied to drm-misc-next.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list