[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Validate the compliance test link parameters

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:51:27PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> Validate the compliance test link parameters when the compliance
> test dpcd registers are read. Also validate them in compute_config
> before using them since the max values might have been reduced
> due to link training fallback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 832786d..cda0f0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1678,12 +1678,15 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
>  		int index;
>  
> -		index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> -					    intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> -					    intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> -		if (index >= 0)
> +		/* Validate the compliance test data */
> +		if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate,
> +					       intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) {
> +			index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> +						    intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> +						    intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
>  			min_clock = max_clock = index;
> -		min_lane_count = max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> +			min_lane_count = max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;

This looks a bit questionable. What if eg. just the link_rate is out of
bounds but the lane count is good?

I think this could be solved in a different way with the patch I posted
maybe one year ago that allowed rate_index() to return a non-exact match,
and by clamping the test_lane count.

> +		}
>  	}
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
>  		      "max bw %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
> @@ -3961,8 +3964,7 @@ intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *sink_irq_vector)
>  static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	int status = 0;
> -	int min_lane_count = 1;
> -	int link_rate_index, test_link_rate;
> +	int test_link_rate;
>  	uint8_t test_lane_count, test_link_bw;
>  	/* (DP CTS 1.2)
>  	 * 4.3.1.11
> @@ -3976,10 +3978,6 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		return DP_TEST_NAK;
>  	}
>  	test_lane_count &= DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT_MASK;
> -	/* Validate the requested lane count */
> -	if (test_lane_count < min_lane_count ||
> -	    test_lane_count > intel_dp->max_link_lane_count)
> -		return DP_TEST_NAK;
>  
>  	status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_LINK_RATE,
>  				   &test_link_bw);
> @@ -3987,12 +3985,11 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Rate read failed\n");
>  		return DP_TEST_NAK;
>  	}
> -	/* Validate the requested link rate */
>  	test_link_rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(test_link_bw);
> -	link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> -					      intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> -					      test_link_rate);
> -	if (link_rate_index < 0)
> +
> +	/* Validate the requested link rate and lane count */
> +	if (!intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, test_link_rate,
> +					test_lane_count))
>  		return DP_TEST_NAK;
>  
>  	intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count = test_lane_count;
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC