[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/cnl: Allow dynamic cdclk changes on CNL
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Fri Jun 9 13:00:09 UTC 2017
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:03:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> All the low level cdclk bits are present, so let's add the required
> hooks to reconfigure cdclk on the fly.
>
> v2: Rebase due to cnl_sanitize_cdclk()
> v3: Rebased by Rodrigo on top of Ville's cdclk rework.
> v4: Rebase moving cnl_calc_cdclk up to follow same order
> as previous platforms.
> v2: Squash drm/i915/cnl: Adjust min pixel rate. to address
> the current limitation where CDCLK cannot be set to 168MHz
> if audio is used with 96MHz. (Imre)
>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>
> Cannonlake also needs to adjust the minimal pixel rate
> as gen9 platforms. Specially for the Azalia audio case.
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> Cc: Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index 35a1432..1d7cfc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1400,6 +1400,16 @@ void bxt_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> }
>
> +static int cnl_calc_cdclk(int max_pixclk)
> +{
> + if (max_pixclk > 336000)
> + return 528000;
> + else if (max_pixclk > 168000)
> + return 336000;
> + else
> + return 168000;
> +}
> +
> static void cnl_cdclk_pll_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> {
> @@ -1641,7 +1651,7 @@ void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> cdclk_state = dev_priv->cdclk.hw;
>
> - cdclk_state.cdclk = 168000;
> + cdclk_state.cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> cdclk_state.vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk_state.cdclk);
>
> cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> @@ -1768,7 +1778,7 @@ static int intel_max_pixel_rate(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>
> pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
>
> - if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9(dev_priv))
> + if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
We have to remember to check this on newer platforms, looks ok for
now:
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> pixel_rate =
> bdw_adjust_min_pipe_pixel_rate(crtc_state,
> pixel_rate);
> @@ -1929,6 +1939,40 @@ static int bxt_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->dev);
> + struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state =
> + to_intel_atomic_state(state);
> + int max_pixclk = intel_max_pixel_rate(state);
> + int cdclk, vco;
> +
> + cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(max_pixclk);
> + vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk);
> +
> + if (cdclk > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("requested cdclk (%d kHz) exceeds max (%d kHz)\n",
> + cdclk, dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + intel_state->cdclk.logical.vco = vco;
> + intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
> +
> + if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
> + cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> + vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk);
> +
> + intel_state->cdclk.actual.vco = vco;
> + intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
> + } else {
> + intel_state->cdclk.actual =
> + intel_state->cdclk.logical;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> int max_cdclk_freq = dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq;
> @@ -1960,7 +2004,9 @@ static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> */
> void intel_update_max_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) {
> + if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> + dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq = 528000;
> + } else if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) {
> u32 limit = I915_READ(SKL_DFSM) & SKL_DFSM_CDCLK_LIMIT_MASK;
> int max_cdclk, vco;
>
> @@ -2157,6 +2203,10 @@ void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = skl_set_cdclk;
> dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk =
> skl_modeset_calc_cdclk;
> + } else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> + dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = cnl_set_cdclk;
> + dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk =
> + cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk;
> }
>
> if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
> --
> 1.9.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list