[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gen10: Calculate and enable transition WM

Mahesh Kumar mahesh1.kumar at intel.com
Tue Jun 13 09:44:53 UTC 2017


Hi,


On Tuesday 13 June 2017 02:59 PM, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Mahesh Kumar schreef op di 13-06-2017 om 11:34 [+0530]:
>> GEN > 9 require transition WM to be programmed if IPC is enabled.
>> This patch calculates & enable transition WM for supported platforms.
>> If transition WM is enabled, Plane read requests are sent at high
>> priority until filling above the transition watermark, then the
>> requests are sent at lower priority until dropping below the level-0
>> WM.
>> The lower priority requests allow other memory clients to have better
>> memory access.
>>
>> transition minimum is the minimum amount needed for trans_wm to work
>> to
>> ensure  the demote does not happen before enough data has been read
>> to
>> meet the level 0 watermark requirements.
>>
>> transition amount is configurable value. Higher values will
>> tend to cause longer periods of high priority reads followed by
>> longer
>> periods of lower priority reads. Tuning to lower values will tend to
>> cause shorter periods of high and lower priority reads.
>>
>> Keeping transition amount to 0 in this patch.
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 51
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index 10ec2660acd7..6b951aa14840 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -4163,6 +4163,15 @@ skl_enable_plane_wm_levels(const struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>   			level_wm->plane_en = true;
>>   		}
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Unsupported GEN will have plane_res_b = 0 & transition WM
>> for
>> +	 * them will get disabled here.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (wm->trans_wm.plane_res_b && wm->trans_wm.plane_res_b <
>> plane_ddb)
>> +		wm->trans_wm.plane_en = true;
>> +	else
>> +		wm->trans_wm.plane_en = false;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int
>> @@ -4639,13 +4648,48 @@ skl_compute_linetime_wm(struct
>> intel_crtc_state *cstate)
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void skl_compute_transition_wm(struct intel_crtc_state
>> *cstate,
>> +				      struct skl_wm_params *wp,
>> +				      struct skl_wm_level *wm_l0,
>>   				      struct skl_wm_level *trans_wm
>> /* out */)
>>   {
>> +	struct drm_device *dev = cstate->base.crtc->dev;
>> +	const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>> +	uint16_t trans_min, trans_y_tile_min;
>> +	uint16_t trans_amount = 0; /* This is configurable amount */
>> +	uint16_t trans_offset_b, res_blocks;
>> +
>>   	if (!cstate->base.active)
>>   		return;
>> -	/* Until we know more, just disable transition WMs */
>> -	trans_wm->plane_en = false;
>> +	/* Transition WM are not recommended by HW team for GEN9 */
>> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 9)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* Transition WM don't have any impact if ipc is disabled */
>> +	if (!dev_priv->ipc_enabled)
>> +		return;
> ipc_enabled is never set, so this patch on its own doesn't do much. :)
If I enable IPC, I observed many fifo underrun in only fi-glk, that's 
the reason I didn't push IPC patch.
I'll debug further for under-run in glk with IPC & post that patch later.

thanks for review :)

-Mahesh
> Otherwise series looks good, I didn't check the math on this patch,
> but the series doesn't regress KBL.
>
> For patch 3 and 4:
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>
> For patch 5 and 6:
> Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>
>> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
>> +		trans_min = 4;
>> +
>> +	trans_offset_b = trans_min + trans_amount;
>> +	trans_y_tile_min = (uint16_t) mul_round_up_u32_fixed16(2,
>> +							wp-
>>> y_tile_minimum);
>> +
>> +	if (wp->y_tiled) {
>> +		res_blocks = max(wm_l0->plane_res_b,
>> trans_y_tile_min) +
>> +				trans_offset_b;
>> +	} else {
>> +		res_blocks = wm_l0->plane_res_b + trans_offset_b;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	res_blocks += 1;
>> +
>> +	/* WA BUG:1938466 add one block for non y-tile planes */
>> +	if (!wp->y_tiled && IS_CNL_REVID(dev_priv, CNL_REVID_A0,
>> CNL_REVID_A0))
>> +		res_blocks += 1;
>> +
>> +	trans_wm->plane_res_b = res_blocks;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>> @@ -4684,7 +4728,8 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct
>> intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>>   					    &wm_params, wm);
>>   		if (ret)
>>   			return ret;
>> -		skl_compute_transition_wm(cstate, &wm->trans_wm);
>> +		skl_compute_transition_wm(cstate, &wm_params, &wm-
>>> wm[0],
>> +					  &wm->trans_wm);
>>   	}
>>   	pipe_wm->linetime = skl_compute_linetime_wm(cstate);
>>   



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list