[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: Rename I915_MAX_PIPES to IGT_MAX_PIPES

[Arkadiusz Hiler]

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:56:24PM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:11:36AM -0400, Leo wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 2017-06-13 08:55 AM, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:41:14PM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:35:34AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com> wrote:
> > > > > > The email was sent but might be stuck in the moderation queue since Leo
> > > > > > (Sun peng) is fairly new on the FDO mailing lists.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Jani, Daniel, can you check if Leo's IGT emails are stuck in the
> > > > > > moderation queue?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Done. I've whitelisted his email address on intel-gfx, but I suggest
> > > > > subscribing too.
> > > > > 
> > > > > BR,
> > > > > Jani.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks Jani.
> > > > 
> > > > I'll wait with pushing this untill we run it though CI system to make
> > > > sure nothing breaks, as suggested by Petri.
> > > 
> > > To clarify - this depends on the series that changes the number to six,
> > > and that's the one that should use some testing.
> > > 
> > > > Thanks for the patch!
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Arek
> > 
> > Thanks Jani.
> > 
> > Arek, regarding CI - are there any updates on the test results?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Leo
> 
> Sorry for the delay, we were preoccupied with other things. The run
> should happen after the current in-flight one.
> 
> I'll notify you of the results once we've got them.
> 
> Thanks for your patience.

The patch was ran through our CI and does not cause any regression. I'll
push both in a moment (increasing the number to 6 and rename).

Thanks!

-- 
Cheers,
Arek