[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Assert the vma's active tracking is clear before free
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Jun 20 12:43:21 UTC 2017
In looking at a use-after-free on Baytrail, it looks like the VMA's
activity tracking is suspect. Add some asserts to catch freeing the VMA
before we have decoupled all of its i915_gem_active trackers.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101511
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
c: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
index 1cfe137cdc32..958be0a95960 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
@@ -579,11 +579,17 @@ int __i915_vma_do_pin(struct i915_vma *vma,
static void i915_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
+ int i;
+
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->node.allocated);
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_active(vma));
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_closed(vma));
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->fence);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vma->last_read); i++)
+ GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_active_isset(&vma->last_read[i]));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_active_isset(&vma->last_fence));
+
list_del(&vma->vm_link);
if (!i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma))
i915_ppgtt_put(i915_vm_to_ppgtt(vma->vm));
@@ -680,9 +686,8 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
__i915_vma_unpin(vma);
if (ret)
return ret;
-
- GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_active(vma));
}
+ GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_active(vma));
if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma))
return -EBUSY;
--
2.11.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list