[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Fix the t11_t12 delay for non GEN 9 LP platforms at HW readout and HW write
Manasi Navare
manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Wed Jun 21 19:37:43 UTC 2017
According to the eDP spec the minimum value for panel power cycle delay
(t11_t12) is 500ms and as per the Bspec, PP_DIVISOR panel power cycle
delay field should be programmed to "+1" value. Eg: To have a delay
of 500ms this should be programmed to 6. This patch fixes the write
by adding +1 to the pp_div value so it programs the correct min
required panel power cycle delay.
Since we program it to +1 value, when we perform HW readout, this
value should subtract 1 before verifying pps state. This patch makes
this correction as well to avoid "PPS state mismatch" error.
This patch also adds a case where if the readout is 0 for the first readout,
then read it as 0, dont subtract.
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index bca4ac1..089e373 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -5149,6 +5149,7 @@ intel_pps_readout_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct edp_power_seq *seq)
{
u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div = 0, pp_ctl = 0;
+ u16 pp_cycle_delay = 0;
struct pps_registers regs;
intel_pps_get_registers(dev_priv, intel_dp, ®s);
@@ -5177,17 +5178,16 @@ intel_pps_readout_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
seq->t10 = (pp_off & PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_MASK) >>
PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT;
- if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
- u16 tmp = (pp_ctl & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
+ if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv))
+ pp_cycle_delay = (pp_ctl & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT;
- if (tmp > 0)
- seq->t11_t12 = (tmp - 1) * 1000;
- else
- seq->t11_t12 = 0;
- } else {
- seq->t11_t12 = ((pp_div & PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
- PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) * 1000;
- }
+ else
+ pp_cycle_delay = (pp_div & PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
+ PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT;
+ if (pp_cycle_delay > 0)
+ seq->t11_t12 = (pp_cycle_delay - 1) * 1000;
+ else
+ seq->t11_t12 = 0;
}
static void
@@ -5341,7 +5341,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct drm_device *dev,
<< BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
} else {
pp_div = ((100 * div)/2 - 1) << PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
- pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)
+ pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12 + 1, 1000)
<< PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
}
--
2.1.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list