[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Always wakeup the next breadcrumb waiter (rev3)

[Chris Wilson]

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 08:19:43AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Always wakeup the next breadcrumb waiter (rev3)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/20590/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> Series 20590v3 drm/i915: Always wakeup the next breadcrumb waiter
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/20590/revisions/3/mbox/
> 
> Test drv_module_reload:
>         Subgroup basic-reload:
>                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (fi-ilk-650)
> Test gem_exec_flush:
>         Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-uc:
>                 fail       -> PASS       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100007
> Test gem_exec_parallel:
>         Subgroup basic:
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bxt-t5700)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6260u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bxt-j4205)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bdw-5557u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6700hq)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-kbl-7500u)
> Test gem_sync:
>         Subgroup basic-store-all:
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bxt-t5700)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bxt-j4205)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-kbl-7500u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6260u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6700hq)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bdw-5557u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6700k)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6770hq)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bsw-n3050)

Clearly I missed some reason as to why that wakeup *is* required. We are
not as serialised by the spinlock as I thought?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre