[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: introduce drm_i915_gem_object page_size member

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

Hi,

On 06/03/2017 23:54, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c        | 2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 7c20601fe1de..0a6ed2c54629 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3975,6 +3975,8 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>
>  	obj->ops = ops;
>
> +	obj->page_size = I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
>  	reservation_object_init(&obj->__builtin_resv);
>  	obj->resv = &obj->__builtin_resv;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h
> index 33b0dc4782a9..31bcf87d3745 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h
> @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
>
>  	unsigned long flags;
>
> +	unsigned long page_size; /* 4K(default), 64K, 2M, 1G */
> +

Could we get away with an unsigned int for this field and the colouring, 
function arguments, etc following in subsequent patches? Or it is 
expected that >4G pages might happen in some reasonable time? Maybe a 
pointless saving, I don't know, just asking.

Regards,

Tvrtko

>  	/**
>  	 * Have we taken a reference for the object for incomplete GPU
>  	 * activity?
>