[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: make context status notifier head be per engine
Du, Changbin
changbin.du at intel.com
Thu Mar 9 08:44:14 UTC 2017
hi, is there any comments for this? I'd like hear chris and daniel's
comments. :)
Thanks,
Changbin
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:23:05PM +0800, changbin.du at intel.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du <changbin.du at intel.com>
>
> hi, Daniel, Chris and All,
> As you know, GVTg introduced the context status notifier to schedule
> the GVTg workload. At that time, the notifier is bound to GVTg context
> only, so GVTg is not aware of host workloads.
>
> Now we are going to improve GVTg's guest workload scheduler policy,
> and add Guc emulation support for new Gen graphics. Both these two
> features require acknowledgment for all contexts running on hardware.
> (But will not alter host workload.) So here try to make some change.
>
> The change is easy:
> 1. Move the context status notifier head from i915_gem_context to
> intel_engine_cs. Which means there is a notifier head per engine
> instead of per context. Execlist driver still call notifier for
> each context sched-in/out events of current engine.
> 2. At GVTg side, it binds a notifier_block for each physical engine
> at GVTg initialization period. Then GVTg can hear all context
> status events.
>
> In this RFC patch, GVTg do nothing for host context event, but later
> will add a function there. But in any case, the notifier callback is
> a noop if this is no active vGPU.
>
> Since intel_gvt_init() is called at early initialization stage and
> require the status notifier head has been initiated, I initiate it in
> intel_engine_setup(). I am not sure if this is the right place, please
> correct me if wrong. Thank you! Look forward to your feedback. :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du at intel.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20170309/db5ae11c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list