[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Assert that we do not shortcut the current bottom-half

[Chris Wilson]

We need to ensure that we always serialize updates to the bottom-half
using the breadcrumbs.irq_lock so that we don't race with a concurrent
interrupt handler. This is most important just prior to leaving the
waiter (when the intel_wait will be overwritten), so make sure we are
not the current bottom-half when skipping the irq locks.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index ebcb595001fc..d10148567dbc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ static inline void __intel_breadcrumbs_finish(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b,
 					      struct intel_wait *wait)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&b->rb_lock);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(b->irq_wait == wait);
 
 	/* This request is completed, so remove it from the tree, mark it as
 	 * complete, and *then* wake up the associated task.
@@ -517,8 +518,10 @@ void intel_engine_remove_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	 * the tree by the bottom-half to avoid contention on the spinlock
 	 * by the herd.
 	 */
-	if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&wait->node))
+	if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&wait->node)) {
+		GEM_BUG_ON(READ_ONCE(b->irq_wait) == wait);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
 	__intel_engine_remove_wait(engine, wait);
-- 
2.11.0