[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/19] drm/tegra: Don't use modeset_lock_crtc
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Wed Mar 22 21:50:46 UTC 2017
Yes the help text is unhelpful, but atomic drivers should never use
this. Just grab the lock without context or anything.
Also an aside: Checking ->active like this doesn't protect against
nonblocking commits, this is rather bogus.
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
index 0db5d5a8d3b9..95b373f739f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
@@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static int tegra_dc_show_regs(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
struct tegra_dc *dc = node->info_ent->data;
int err = 0;
- drm_modeset_lock_crtc(&dc->base, NULL);
+ drm_modeset_lock(&dc->base.mutex, NULL);
if (!dc->base.state->active) {
err = -EBUSY;
@@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ static int tegra_dc_show_regs(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
#undef DUMP_REG
unlock:
- drm_modeset_unlock_crtc(&dc->base);
+ drm_modeset_unlock(&dc->base.mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ static int tegra_dc_show_crc(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
int err = 0;
u32 value;
- drm_modeset_lock_crtc(&dc->base, NULL);
+ drm_modeset_lock(&dc->base.mutex, NULL);
if (!dc->base.state->active) {
err = -EBUSY;
@@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@ static int tegra_dc_show_crc(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
tegra_dc_writel(dc, 0, DC_COM_CRC_CONTROL);
unlock:
- drm_modeset_unlock_crtc(&dc->base);
+ drm_modeset_unlock(&dc->base.mutex);
return err;
}
--
2.11.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list