[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Actually pass the reclaim gfp_t along to shmemfs!

[Chris Wilson]

Words cannot describe the embarrassment at creating a new gfp_t relaim to
only prevent the oomkiller but allow direct|kswapd reclaim, and then not
use it in the shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp().

Fixes: 24f8e00a8a2e ("drm/i915: Prefer to report ENOMEM rather than incur the oom for gfx allocations")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 96fc76d44145..174c85618450 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2312,7 +2312,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 			reclaim = mapping_gfp_constraint(mapping, 0);
 			reclaim |= __GFP_NORETRY; /* reclaim, but no oom */
 
-			page = shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp(mapping, i, gfp);
+			page = shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp(mapping, i, reclaim);
 			if (IS_ERR(page)) {
 				ret = PTR_ERR(page);
 				goto err_sg;
-- 
2.11.0