[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Validate cached link rate and lane count before retraining
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Mar 27 15:26:06 UTC 2017
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:11:32PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
>> Currently intel_dp_check_link_status() tries to retrain the link if
>> Clock recovery or Channel EQ for any of the lanes indicated by
>> intel_dp->lane_count is not set. However these values cached in intel_dp
>> structure can be stale if link training has failed for these values
>> during previous modeset. Or these values can get stale since we have
>> now re read the DPCD registers or it can be 0 in case of connected boot
>> case.
>>
>> This patch validates these values against the common_rates and max lane
>> count values.
>>
>> This is absolutely required incase the common_rates or max lane count
>> are now different due to link fallback.
>>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index fd96a6c..51fa6b5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -295,6 +295,23 @@ static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool intel_dp_link_params_is_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> +{
>> + int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
>> + int link_rate_index;
>> +
>> + link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp,
>> + common_rates,
>> + intel_dp->link_rate);
>
> Hmm. I thought we started to store the common rates somewhere more
> permanent, or did I imagine that?
That series got stalled waiting for Manasi's stuff to land... which
means it's now conflicting and pending rebase, and still waiting. :(
J.
>
>> + if (link_rate_index < 0)
>> + return false;
>> + if (!intel_dp->lane_count ||
>> + (intel_dp->lane_count > intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp)))
>
> Needless parens.
>
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> int link_rate, uint8_t lane_count)
>> {
>> @@ -4224,9 +4241,10 @@ intel_dp_check_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> if (!to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc)->active)
>> return;
>>
>> - /* FIXME: we need to synchronize this sort of stuff with hardware
>> - * readout. Currently fast link training doesn't work on boot-up. */
>
> You shouldn't remove the FIXME. It's still totally valid.
>
>> - if (!intel_dp->lane_count)
>> + /* Validate the cached values of intel_dp->link_rate and
>> + * intel_dp->lane_count before attempting to retrain.
>> + */
>> + if (!intel_dp_link_params_is_valid(intel_dp))
>> return;
>>
>> /* Retrain if Channel EQ or CR not ok */
>> --
>> 2.1.4
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list