[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Wait for all engines to be idle as part of i915_gem_wait_for_idle()

[Chris Wilson]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Make i915_gem_wait_for_idle() be a little heavier in order to try and
> guarantee that the GPU is indeed idle (by checking each engine
> individually is idle, i.e. all writes are complete and the rings
> stopped) after waiting for in-flight requests to be completed.
> 
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98836
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index ec194d3e6cd3..5f0aff016eb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3054,6 +3054,19 @@ static int wait_for_timeline(struct i915_gem_timeline *tl, unsigned int flags)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int wait_for_engines(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	enum intel_engine_id id;
> +
> +	for_each_engine(engine, i915, id) {
> +		if (GEM_WARN_ON(wait_for(intel_engine_is_idle(engine), 50)))

And I might want to consider an inline for
wait_for(intel_engine_is_idle)) to avoid the hideous string :)
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre