[Intel-gfx] Panic after S3 resume and modeset with MST

Takashi Iwai tiwai at suse.de
Thu Mar 30 05:55:30 UTC 2017


On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:24:37 +0200,
Lyude Paul wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 15:54 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:34:15 +0200,
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 03:10:09PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:02:13 +0200,
> > > > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > the upstream fix a16b7658f4e0d4aec9bc3e75a5f0cc3f7a3a0422
> > > > >     drm/i915: Call intel_dp_mst_resume() before resuming
> > > > > displays
> > > > > 
> > > > > seems to trigger a kernel panic when some modeset change
> > > > > happens after
> > > > > S3 resume.  The details are found in openSUSE bugzilla,
> > > > >   https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029634
> > > > > 
> > > > > In short, the following procedure causes a kernel panic
> > > > > (supposedly)
> > > > > almost 100% on Dell Latitude with Skylake with MST DP on dock:
> > > > > 
> > > > > - Boot with a docking station, DP-1 connected.
> > > > > - Login on X
> > > > > - xrandr --output eDP-1 --primary --auto --output DP-1-1 --auto 
> > > > > --left-of eDP-1
> > > > >   ==> This changes the mode.
> > > > > - Suspend ("systemctl suspend" in my case), and close the lid.
> > > > > - Remove from the dock (keep the lid closed).
> > > > > - Open the lid, which resumes automatically.  It works.
> > > > > - Suspend again.
> > > > > - Connect to the dock again (keep the lid closed).
> > > > > - Open the lid, which resumes automatically.  It's still OK.
> > > > > - xrandr --output eDP-1 --primary --auto --output DP-1-1 --auto 
> > > > > --left-of eDP-1
> > > > >   ==> Now the kernel feezes.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reverting the commit mentioned above fixes the problem.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The problem is present in all versions I tested.  The reported
> > > > > kernel
> > > > > in the Bugzilla is 4.4.x-based one, but the issue is seen in
> > > > > 4.11-rc3,
> > > > > too.  Note that the S3 resume itself works in 4.11-rc3; the
> > > > > kernel
> > > > > panic happens when invoking xrandr manually after that.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Unfortunately, I couldn't get a kernel panic message, so
> > > > > far.  kdump
> > > > > didn't work well in this case by some reason.  There are some
> > > > > screenshots taken by the original reporter (could switch VT
> > > > > beforehand), but I don't know whether it helps.
> > > > > 
> > > > > If you have any hints for further debugging, it'd be highly
> > > > > appreciated.
> > > > 
> > > > It seems that the patch below works around the problem.
> > > > Can anyone enlighten what's going on there?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Takashi
> > > > 
> > > > -- 8< --
> > > > From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix crash after S3 resume with DP MST
> > > > mode change
> > > > 
> > > > We've got a bug report showing that Skylake Dell machines with a
> > > > docking station causes a kernel panic after S3 resume and
> > > > modeset.
> > > > The details are found in the openSUSE bugzilla entry below.  The
> > > > typical test procedure is:
> > > > 
> > > > - Laptop is Dell Latitude with eDP (1366x768)
> > > > - Boot with docking station connected to a DP (1920x1080)
> > > > - Login, change the mode via
> > > >   xrandr --output eDP-1 --auto --output DP-1-1 --auto --left-of
> > > > eDP-1
> > > > - Suspend, and close the lid after the suspend
> > > >   (or close the lid to trigger the suspend)
> > > > - Undock while keeping the lid closed.
> > > > - Open the lid, which triggers the resume;
> > > >   the machine wakes up well, and X shows up.  No problem, so far.
> > > > - Suspend again, close the lid.
> > > > - Dock again while keeping the lid closed.
> > > > - Open the lid, triggering the resume; this wakes up still fine.
> > > > - At this moment, run xrandr again to re-setup DP-1
> > > >   xrandr --output eDP-1 --auto --output DP-1-1 --auto --left-of
> > > > eDP-1
> > > >   ==> This triggers a hard crash.
> > > > 
> > > > I could bisect it, and this leaded to the commit a16b7658f4e0
> > > > ("drm/i915: Call intel_dp_mst_resume() before resuming
> > > > displays").
> > > > 
> > > > Basically the commit just shuffles the calls of
> > > > intel_display_resume()
> > > > and intel_dp_mst_resume().  So as a workaround, I tried to split
> > > > intel_dp_mst_resume() call to postpone the suspected code (the
> > > > invocation of intel_dp_check_mst_status()), then bingo, this
> > > > cured the
> > > > problem.
> > > > 
> > > > But don't ask me *why* this fixes.  It's still in a cargo-cult
> > > > state.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: a16b7658f4e0 ("drm/i915: Call intel_dp_mst_resume() before
> > > > resuming displays")
> > > > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029634
> > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c  |  5 ++++-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  3 ++-
> > > >  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > > index 1c75402a59c1..62c40090ceed 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > > @@ -1559,6 +1559,7 @@ static int i915_suspend_switcheroo(struct
> > > > drm_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> > > >  static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > +	int mst_pending;
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > >  
> > > >  	disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
> > > > @@ -1608,10 +1609,12 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct
> > > > drm_device *dev)
> > > >  		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
> > > >  	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> > > >  
> > > > -	intel_dp_mst_resume(dev);
> > > > +	mst_pending = intel_dp_mst_resume(dev);
> > > >  
> > > >  	intel_display_resume(dev);
> > > >  
> > > > +	intel_dp_mst_resume_post(dev, mst_pending);
> > > > +
> > > >  	drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(dev);
> > > >  
> > > >  	/*
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > index d1670b8afbf5..fc5ea900e6f3 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > @@ -6027,9 +6027,10 @@ void intel_dp_mst_suspend(struct
> > > > drm_device *dev)
> > > >  	}
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > +int intel_dp_mst_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > +	int pending = 0;
> > > >  	int i;
> > > >  
> > > >  	for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
> > > > @@ -6041,6 +6042,23 @@ void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct drm_device
> > > > *dev)
> > > >  
> > > >  		ret =
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(&intel_dig_port->dp.mst_mgr);
> > > >  		if (ret)
> > > > +			pending |= 1 << i;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	return pending;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +void intel_dp_mst_resume_post(struct drm_device *dev, int
> > > > pending)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > +	int i;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
> > > > +		struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
> > > > +			dev_priv->hotplug.irq_port[i];
> > > > +		if (!intel_dig_port || !intel_dig_port-
> > > > >dp.can_mst)
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +		if (pending & (1 << i))
> > > >  			intel_dp_check_mst_status(&intel_dig_por
> > > > t->dp);
> > > >  	}
> > > >  }
> > > 
> > > The whole MST resume is a bit of chicken and egg type of situation.
> > > We
> > > need the HPD interrupts to resume the previous state, but we don't
> > > want
> > > to actually process real hotplugs until we've done the resume. The
> > > current code is definitely broken IMO.
> > > 
> > > But I'm not really sure why this patch fixes things because the HPD
> > > processing that will occur when we talk to the sink during the
> > > display
> > > resume should also call intel_dp_check_mst_status().
> > 
> > Actually, just dropping intel_dp_check_mst_status() calls in
> > intel_dp_mst_resume() seems enough to fix the problem.
> > 
> > Below is the v2 patch doing that.  Does it make more sense?
> 
> Barely, unfortunately :(. I'll be honest I'm a little surprised this
> patch doesn't break anything, but you do seem to be right in saying
> that hotplugging re-sets up the displays in the event that things go
> wrong.
> 
> Going through the backtrace and the dmesg that you gave on the bugzilla
> I can't figure out any definitive answer for why this is crashing. We
> will have to get dmesg output from when it crashes to understand this
> I'm pretty sure.
> 
> JFYI (I really need to make a guide for this somewhere...) I usually
> use the netconsole module to get kernel output from machines when they
> kernel panic. In your case I would set this up right before you do the
> final `xrandr` call that kills the machine, since netconsole has not
> been very reliable in my experience over suspend/resume cycles. It
> might take a few tries to get it to print the whole crash to the
> netconsole (and you will need to make sure the system has a PCI
> ethernet adapter, USB or wifi won't do), but this usually works.

I've already tried netconsole (even before kdump), but unfortunately
it doesn't work in this case.  As mentioned in Bugzilla, the network
goes crazy when the machine crashes (even the whole network segment
the machine connects to is stalling).  It's similar like the symptom
we've seen with the SKL CPU-state screw up in the past with intel_idle
driver.

> If you could try getting a full dmesg with this, that would be super
> appreciated.
> 
> JFYI: in the future you should use git send-email for sending these
> patches to intel-gfx, since the format you sent it in is preventing
> your patch from getting noticed by patchwork. Other then that though:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lyude <lyude at redhat.com>

Thanks, it's not meant to be a real submission of the patch, but
currently it's still a sort of RFC.  If there is no better solution
insight, I'll submit it as a proper fix patch.


Takashi

> > 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > Takashi
> > 
> > -- 8< --
> > From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de>
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix crash after S3 resume with DP MST mode
> > change
> >  (v2)
> > 
> > We've got a bug report showing that Skylake Dell machines with a
> > docking station causes a kernel panic after S3 resume and modeset.
> > The details are found in the openSUSE bugzilla entry below.  The
> > typical test procedure is:
> > 
> > - Laptop is Dell Latitude with eDP (1366x768)
> > - Boot with docking station connected to a DP (1920x1080)
> > - Login, change the mode via
> >   xrandr --output eDP-1 --auto --output DP-1-1 --auto --left-of eDP-1
> > - Suspend, and close the lid after the suspend
> >   (or close the lid to trigger the suspend)
> > - Undock while keeping the lid closed.
> > - Open the lid, which triggers the resume;
> >   the machine wakes up well, and X shows up.  No problem, so far.
> > - Suspend again, close the lid.
> > - Dock again while keeping the lid closed.
> > - Open the lid, triggering the resume; this wakes up still fine.
> > - At this moment, run xrandr again to re-setup DP-1
> >   xrandr --output eDP-1 --auto --output DP-1-1 --auto --left-of eDP-1
> >   ==> This triggers a hard crash.
> > 
> > I could bisect it, and this leaded to the commit a16b7658f4e0
> > ("drm/i915: Call intel_dp_mst_resume() before resuming displays").
> > 
> > This patch tries to work around the crash by ignoring the failed port
> > from drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume().  They should be handled in hpd
> > later in anyway.
> > 
> > v1->v2: just ignore the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume() error codes
> >         instead of postponing.
> > 
> > Fixes: a16b7658f4e0 ("drm/i915: Call intel_dp_mst_resume() before
> > resuming displays")
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029634
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index d1670b8afbf5..a6c0f0ac16eb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -6041,6 +6041,7 @@ void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct drm_device
> > *dev)
> >  
> >  		ret =
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(&intel_dig_port->dp.mst_mgr);
> >  		if (ret)
> > -			intel_dp_check_mst_status(&intel_dig_port-
> > >dp);
> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP MST resume failed for
> > port-%c\n",
> > +				      port_name(intel_dig_port-
> > >port));
> >  	}
> >  }
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 	Lyude
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list