[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/GuC/GLK: Load GuC on GLK

[Joonas Lahtinen]

On ke, 2017-03-29 at 00:01 +0000, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 22:11 +0000, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > > > @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
> > > >  #define KBL_FW_MAJOR 9
> > > >  #define KBL_FW_MINOR 14
> > > > 
> > > > +#define GLK_FW_MAJOR 10
> > > > +#define GLK_FW_MINOR 56
> > > > +
> > > >  #define GUC_FW_PATH(platform, major, minor) \
> > > >         "i915/" __stringify(platform) "_guc_ver" __stringify(major)
> > > > "_" __stringify(minor) ".bin"
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -73,6 +76,8 @@ MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_BXT_GUC_UCODE);
> > > >  #define I915_KBL_GUC_UCODE GUC_FW_PATH(kbl, KBL_FW_MAJOR,
> > > > KBL_FW_MINOR)
> > > >  MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_KBL_GUC_UCODE);
> > > > 
> > > > +#define I915_GLK_GUC_UCODE GUC_FW_PATH(glk, GLK_FW_MAJOR,
> > > > GLK_FW_MINOR)
> > > 
> > > You need a line after this #define that says the following:
> > >   MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_GLK_GUC_UCODE);
> > 
> > Hi John, we have decided to not use it in pre-production platforms.
> > Using MODULE_FIRMWARE is going to shout that the firmware is not
> > available in systems. Since we will not be releasing the firmware
> > binary to the public yet,  it is unnecessary noise.
> 
> +MODULE_FIRMARE() should be in a separated patch and only get merged
> after the firmware got released at 01.org propagated and merged to
> linux-firmware.git.

Would it make a sense to put a big comment in the code at this spot?
Pretty much what you wrote down.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation