[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10] drm/i915: Implement Link Rate fallback on Link training failure
Manasi Navare
manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Fri Mar 31 18:17:05 UTC 2017
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:33:04PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jani,
> >
> > I have reviewed your recent DP link rate / lane count
> > refactoring patch series and I believe that it will soon get merged.
>
> I haven't received reviews on all of the patches in my series yet, in
> particular the first patches are missing reviews so I can't even get
> started pushing them.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
Ok, I will spend some time reviewing these patches today so you
can push those.
Is that why you are waiting to merge this patch?
Regards
Manasi
>
> >
> > Are you waiting on merging this patch so that your refactoring
> > series gets merged first? Or can we merge this patch since
> > it already has ACKs and R-bs.
> >
> > Please advise on next steps for this patch, since some
> > of the PSR related patches are pending merge because of this.
> >
> > Regards
> > Manasi
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:44:36AM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >> Hi Jani/Ville,
> >>
> >> I need to add another quick fix which would be required for the fallback
> >> to happen as expected. Should I respin this patch to add that fix or
> >> should I wait for this to get landed?
> >>
> >> I have mentioned the fix suggested below, please let me know your thoughts on that.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:11:51PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >> > If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular
> >> > mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we
> >> > let the modeset complete and then retry. We save the link rate
> >> > value at which link training failed, update the link status property
> >> > to "BAD" and use a lower link rate to prune the modes. It will redo
> >> > the modeset on the current mode at lower link rate or if the current
> >> > mode gets pruned due to lower link constraints then, it will send a
> >> > hotplug uevent for userspace to handle it.
> >> >
> >> > This is also required to pass DP CTS tests 4.3.1.3, 4.3.1.4,
> >> > 4.3.1.6.
> >> >
> >> > This patch is a resend of the original commit id (233ce881dd91fb
> >> > "drm/i915: Implement Link Rate fallback on Link training failure")
> >> > which got reverted in this commit id (afc1ebf4562a14 Revert
> >> > "drm/i915: Implement Link Rate fallback on Link training failure")
> >> > due to CI failures.
> >> >
> >> > After investigating the CI failures it was found that these
> >> > were essentially the failures which were always there but hidden because
> >> > they used to be DRM_DEBUG_KMS messages for link failures so never got
> >> > caught by CI. But now this patch actually throws DRM_ERROR if the link
> >> > training fails at RBR and 1 lane. So it caught these link train failures.
> >> >
> >> > There were two failures:
> >> > 1. On SKL 6700k this was because the machine in CI lab is a SKL desktop
> >> > without eDP on Port A. But our VBT initialization code in the driver writes
> >> > VBT defaults in a way that it always sets DP flag on Port A and this does
> >> > not get cleared after parsing the VBT outputs. This has been fixed in
> >> > commit id (bb1d132935c2f8 "drm/i915/vbt: split out defaults that are set
> >> > when there is no VBT) and (665788572c6410b "drm/i915/vbt: don't propagate
> >> > errors from intel_bios_init())
> >> >
> >> > 2. On ILK-650 desktop - This was happening because of a bad monitor desktop
> >> > combination. I switched the monitor in the CI lab and that helped get rid
> >> > of the link failures on ILK system.
> >> >
> >> > v10:
> >> > * Rebase on drm-tip and resend after revert
> >> > v9:
> >> > * Use the trimmed max values of link rate/lane count based on
> >> > link train fallback (Daniel Vetter)
> >> > v8:
> >> > * Set link_status to BAD first and then call mode_valid (Jani Nikula)
> >> > v7:
> >> > Remove the redundant variable in previous patch itself
> >> > v6:
> >> > * Obtain link rate index from fallback_link_rate using
> >> > the helper intel_dp_link_rate_index (Jani Nikula)
> >> > * Include fallback within intel_dp_start_link_train (Jani Nikula)
> >> > v5:
> >> > * Move set link status to drm core (Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula)
> >> > v4:
> >> > * Add fallback support for non DDI platforms too
> >> > * Set connector->link status inside set_link_status function
> >> > (Jani Nikula)
> >> > v3:
> >> > * Set link status property to BAd unconditionally (Jani Nikula)
> >> > * Dont use two separate variables link_train_failed and link_status
> >> > to indicate same thing (Jani Nikula)
> >> > v2:
> >> > * Squashed a few patches (Jani Nikula)
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng at amd.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.wentland at amd.com>
> >> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 +++
> >> > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> > index fd96a6c..895f934 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> > @@ -5924,6 +5924,29 @@ intel_dp_init_connector_port_info(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port)
> >> > }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +static void intel_dp_modeset_retry_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct intel_connector *intel_connector;
> >> > + struct drm_connector *connector;
> >> > +
> >> > + intel_connector = container_of(work, typeof(*intel_connector),
> >> > + modeset_retry_work);
> >> > + connector = &intel_connector->base;
> >> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n", connector->base.id,
> >> > + connector->name);
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Grab the locks before changing connector property*/
> >> > + mutex_lock(&connector->dev->mode_config.mutex);
> >> > + /* Set connector link status to BAD and send a Uevent to notify
> >> > + * userspace to do a modeset.
> >> > + */
> >> > + drm_mode_connector_set_link_status_property(connector,
> >> > + DRM_MODE_LINK_STATUS_BAD);
> >> > + mutex_unlock(&connector->dev->mode_config.mutex);
> >> > + /* Send Hotplug uevent so userspace can reprobe */
> >> > + drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(connector->dev);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > bool
> >> > intel_dp_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> >> > struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> >> > @@ -5936,6 +5959,10 @@ intel_dp_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> >> > enum port port = intel_dig_port->port;
> >> > int type;
> >> >
> >> > + /* Initialize the work for modeset in case of link train failure */
> >> > + INIT_WORK(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work,
> >> > + intel_dp_modeset_retry_work_fn);
> >> > +
> >> > if (WARN(intel_dig_port->max_lanes < 1,
> >> > "Not enough lanes (%d) for DP on port %c\n",
> >> > intel_dig_port->max_lanes, port_name(port)))
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> >> > index 0048b52..955b239 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> >> > @@ -313,6 +313,24 @@ void intel_dp_stop_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >> > void
> >> > intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >> > {
> >> > - intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(intel_dp);
> >> > - intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(intel_dp);
> >> > + struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (!intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(intel_dp))
> >> > + goto failure_handling;
> >> > + if (!intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(intel_dp))
> >> > + goto failure_handling;
> >> > +
> >> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Passed at Link Rate = %d, Lane count = %d",
> >> > + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> >> > + return;
> >> > +
> >> > + failure_handling:
> >> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> >> > + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> >> > + if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> >> > + intel_dp->link_rate,
> >> > + intel_dp->lane_count))
> >> > + /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> >> > + schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> >>
> >> This is where the new boolean intel_dp->train_set_valid will have to be set to false on failure.
> >> This ensures that we dont end up retraining at the same parameters in intel_dp_check_link_status()
> >>
> >> So in intel_dp_check-link_status , just before retraining it will add a check,
> >> if (!intel_dp->train_set_valid)
> >> return;
> >>
> >> Ville/Jani what are your thoughts on this?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Manasi
> >>
> >> > + return;
> >> > }
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> > index 51228fe..0fe1ac8 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> > @@ -321,6 +321,9 @@ struct intel_connector {
> >> > void *port; /* store this opaque as its illegal to dereference it */
> >> >
> >> > struct intel_dp *mst_port;
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Work struct to schedule a uevent on link train failure */
> >> > + struct work_struct modeset_retry_work;
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > struct dpll {
> >> > --
> >> > 2.1.4
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list