[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: support QEMU getting the dmabuf
Chen, Xiaoguang
xiaoguang.chen at intel.com
Wed May 3 01:39:28 UTC 2017
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kraxel at redhat.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 5:51 PM
>To: Chen, Xiaoguang <xiaoguang.chen at intel.com>
>Cc: alex.williamson at redhat.com; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gvt-
>dev at lists.freedesktop.org; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang at intel.com>;
>zhenyuw at linux.intel.com; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Lv, Zhiyuan
><zhiyuan.lv at intel.com>; Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian at intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: support QEMU getting the dmabuf
>
>On Fr, 2017-04-28 at 17:35 +0800, Xiaoguang Chen wrote:
>> +static size_t intel_vgpu_reg_rw_gvtg(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, char
>> *buf,
>> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos, bool iswrite) {
>> + unsigned int i = VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(*ppos) -
>> + VFIO_PCI_NUM_REGIONS;
>> + loff_t pos = *ppos & VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_MASK;
>> + int fd;
>> +
>> + if (pos >= vgpu->vdev.region[i].size || iswrite) {
>> + gvt_vgpu_err("invalid op or offset for Intel vgpu fd
>> region\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + fd = anon_inode_getfd("gvtg", &intel_vgpu_gvtg_ops, vgpu,
>> + O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
>> + if (fd < 0) {
>> + gvt_vgpu_err("create intel vgpu fd failed:%d\n", fd);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + count = min(count, (size_t)(vgpu->vdev.region[i].size - pos));
>> + memcpy(buf, &fd, count);
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>
>Hmm, that looks like a rather strange way to return a file descriptor.
>
>What is the reason to not use ioctls on the vfio file handle, like older version of
>these patches did?
If I understood correctly that Alex prefer not to change the ioctls on the vfio file handle like the old version.
So I used this way the smallest change to general vfio framework only adding a subregion definition.
>
>cheers,
> Gerd
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list