[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.
Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Thu May 4 08:12:52 UTC 2017
Op 03-05-17 om 20:03 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>> Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>>>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>>>> Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>>>>>> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
>>>>>>>> The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in
>>>>>>>> case of a nonblocking modeset, page flip enabling/disabling planes or any
>>>>>>>> other reason.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When the crtc is disabled or during a modeset the intermediate watermarks
>>>>>>>> don't need to be programmed separately, and could be directly assigned
>>>>>>>> to the optimal watermarks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also rename crtc_state to new_crtc_state, to distinguish it from the old state.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>>>> - Use intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state. (ville)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>>>>>>>> index 0f344b1fff45..a09396ee1f3d 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -1458,16 +1458,24 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> static int vlv_compute_intermediate_wm(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>>>>> struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>>>>>>> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>>>>>> + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> - struct vlv_wm_state *intermediate = &crtc_state->wm.vlv.intermediate;
>>>>>>>> - const struct vlv_wm_state *optimal = &crtc_state->wm.vlv.optimal;
>>>>>>>> - const struct vlv_wm_state *active = &crtc->wm.active.vlv;
>>>>>>>> + struct vlv_wm_state *intermediate = &new_crtc_state->wm.vlv.intermediate;
>>>>>>>> + const struct vlv_wm_state *optimal = &new_crtc_state->wm.vlv.optimal;
>>>>>>>> + const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
>>>>>>>> + intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(new_crtc_state->base.state, crtc);
>>>>>>>> + const struct vlv_wm_state *active = &old_crtc_state->wm.vlv.optimal;
>>>>>>>> int level;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + if (!new_crtc_state->base.active || drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(&new_crtc_state->base)) {
>>>>>>>> + *intermediate = *optimal;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> intermediate->num_levels = min(optimal->num_levels, active->num_levels);
>>>>>>>> intermediate->cxsr = optimal->cxsr && active->cxsr &&
>>>>>>>> - !crtc_state->disable_cxsr;
>>>>>>>> + !new_crtc_state->disable_cxsr;
>>>>>>> We need to consider disable_cxsr even in the modeset case.
>>>>>> Why is this? crtc_state->disable_cxsr is set if any plane is part of the crtc during modeset, so it's disabled during modeset already.
>>>>> It's set if any plane is enabling/disabling, which should be quite
>>>>> typical during a modeset.
>>>> Yeah but .initial_watermarks is called during crtc_enable, so cxsr will get enabled anyway.
>>> Which is not what we want. CxSR must stay off until the planes have been
>>> enabled.
>>>
>> In that case why is it enabled in .initial_watermarks at all? It should be in optimize_watermarks then..
> Because we can keep it enabled across the update unless planes are
> getting enabled or disabled.
>
So for the modeset case, computing intermediate watermarks:
*intermediate = *optimal;
if (needs_modeset)
intermediate->cxsr = false;
if (optimal->cxsr && !intermediate->cxsr)
new_crtc_state->wm.need_postvbl_update = true;
?
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list