[Intel-gfx] [PATCHv4 3/3] drm/vgem: Enable dmabuf import interfaces

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:25:03PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:45:48AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > 
> > Enable the GEM dma-buf import interfaces in addition to the export
> > interfaces. This lets vgem be used as a test source for other allocators
> > (e.g. Ion).
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v4: Use new drm_gem_prime_import_dev function
> > ---
> >  static const struct vm_operations_struct vgem_gem_vm_ops = {
> > @@ -114,12 +142,8 @@ static void vgem_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> >  	kfree(vfile);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* ioctls */
> > -
> > -static struct drm_gem_object *vgem_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> > -					      struct drm_file *file,
> > -					      unsigned int *handle,
> > -					      unsigned long size)
> > +static struct drm_vgem_gem_object *__vgem_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +						unsigned long size)
> 
> I'm going to guess that doesn't line up anymore. If checkpatch isn't
> complaining, then sorry for the noise.
> 
> > +static struct drm_gem_object *vgem_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +					      struct drm_file *file,
> > +					      unsigned int *handle,
> > +					      unsigned long size)
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> Lgtm, so r-b still good.

I applied all three as-is, I think we can polish more as follow-ups.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch