[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 13/13] tests/gem_exec_nop: Disable headless subtest on cairoless Android

Arkadiusz Hiler arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com
Fri May 5 11:47:34 UTC 2017


On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:00:33AM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:01:55PM +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > Currently whole igt_kms.c is disabled while compiling on Android without
> > cairo, so this tests does not compile.
> > 
> > There should be cleaner a way to disable only cairo dependant parts
> > which should allow us to enable at least some of the KMS tests, but
> > that's a bigger rework for another time.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/Android.mk       | 1 +
> >  tests/gem_exec_nop.c | 4 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/Android.mk b/lib/Android.mk
> > index 31f88be..dc538b8 100644
> > --- a/lib/Android.mk
> > +++ b/lib/Android.mk
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ ifeq ("${ANDROID_HAS_CAIRO}", "1")
> >      LOCAL_C_INCLUDES += $(ANDROID_BUILD_TOP)/external/cairo-1.12.16/src
> >      LOCAL_CFLAGS += -DANDROID_HAS_CAIRO=1 -DIGT_DATADIR=\".\" -DIGT_SRCDIR=\".\"
> >  else
> > +
> >  skip_lib_list := \
> >      igt_kms.c \
> >      igt_kms.h \
> > diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_nop.c b/tests/gem_exec_nop.c
> > index 66c2fc1..967caef 100644
> > --- a/tests/gem_exec_nop.c
> > +++ b/tests/gem_exec_nop.c
> > @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ stable_nop_on_ring(int fd, uint32_t handle, unsigned int engine,
> >  	return n;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#if (!defined(ANDROID)) || (defined(ANDROID) && ANDROID_HAS_CAIRO)
> 
> 
> Tautological check for ANDROID being defined. Is it too confusing to reduce this to
> 
> #if !defined(ANDROID) || ANDROID_HAS_CAIRO

Indeed, thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Arek

> >  #define assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance) \
> >          igt_assert_f((x) <= (1.0 + tolerance) * ref && \
> >                       (x) >= (1.0 - tolerance) * ref, \
> > @@ -178,6 +179,7 @@ static void headless(int fd, uint32_t handle)
> >  	/* check that the two execution speeds are roughly the same */
> >  	assert_within_epsilon(n_headless, n_display, 0.1f);
> >  }
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  static bool ignore_engine(int fd, unsigned engine)
> >  {
> > @@ -561,8 +563,10 @@ igt_main
> >  	igt_subtest("context-sequential")
> >  		sequential(device, handle, FORKED | CONTEXT, 150);
> >  
> > +#if (!defined(ANDROID)) || (defined(ANDROID) && ANDROID_HAS_CAIRO)
> 
> 
> Likewise.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Petri Latvala
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >  	igt_subtest("headless")
> >  		headless(device, handle);
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  	igt_fixture {
> >  		igt_stop_hang_detector();
> > -- 
> > 2.9.3
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list