[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Add gem_exec_reloc/basic-range to BAT

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:13:44AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We have no coverage of sign-extended relocations in BAT, so provide
> some.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>

There's a metric ton of simple abi checks we should add to pre-merge
testing, adding them all to BAT imo doesn't work. And the reloc test here
doesn't feel especially special that we need to have it in BAT.

What would probably help the CI folks is a gem testcase list that includes
all the important stuff (so much more than BAT), but also completes in a
reasonable amount of time (2h as a goal might be good). Atm not even
excluding gem_concurrent_* (which really is a shame, since it has lots of
correctness tests among all the combinatorial stress) doesn't get us
there, with Mexico reporting it takes over 10h to just run that.

Not sure ...
-Daniel

> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index 5ffa2cef..132d8912 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ igt at gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-cpu-active
>  igt at gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-gtt-active
>  igt at gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-read-active
>  igt at gem_exec_reloc@basic-softpin
> +igt at gem_exec_reloc@basic-range
> +igt at gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-active
>  igt at gem_exec_store@basic-all
>  igt at gem_exec_store@basic-blt
>  igt at gem_exec_store@basic-bsd
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch