[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Clear the compliance test data for each long pulse
Manasi Navare
manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Fri May 19 00:52:29 UTC 2017
Each time we handle the long pulse, we check for the test request
interrupt and populate the compliance data in the intel_dp
structure. So the previously populated data becomes stale.
Hence we need to clear the compliance data during each long
pulse handling.
Not clearing the compliance test data for each long pulse
causes compliance failures since each test starts with a new long pulse
and re populates the compliance test data.
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 2dc87a5..8a21181 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4646,9 +4646,11 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
else
status = connector_status_disconnected;
+ /* In either case, clear the stale compliance test data since this
+ * is a new long pulse handling, could be a new test request.
+ */
+ memset(&intel_dp->compliance, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->compliance));
if (status == connector_status_disconnected) {
- memset(&intel_dp->compliance, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->compliance));
-
if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have disappeared %d vs %d\n",
intel_dp->is_mst,
--
2.1.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list