[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915: introduce gtt page size
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue May 23 12:54:57 UTC 2017
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:42:56PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 16 May 2017 at 10:59, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:29:33AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> >> In preparation for supporting huge gtt pages for the ppgtt, we introduce
> >> a gtt_page_size member for gem objects. We fill in the gtt page size by
> >> scanning the sg table to determine the max page size which satisfies the
> >> alignment for each sg entry.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> >> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h | 2 ++
> >> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> index e18f11f77f35..a7a108d18a2d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> @@ -2843,6 +2843,8 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >> #define USES_PPGTT(dev_priv) (i915.enable_ppgtt)
> >> #define USES_FULL_PPGTT(dev_priv) (i915.enable_ppgtt >= 2)
> >> #define USES_FULL_48BIT_PPGTT(dev_priv) (i915.enable_ppgtt == 3)
> >> +#define HAS_PAGE_SIZE(dev_priv, page_size) \
> >> + ((dev_priv)->info.page_size_mask & (page_size))
> >>
> >> #define HAS_OVERLAY(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_overlay)
> >> #define OVERLAY_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev_priv) \
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >> index 0c1cbe98c994..6a5e864d7710 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >> @@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ void __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> if (!IS_ERR(pages))
> >> obj->ops->put_pages(obj, pages);
> >>
> >> + obj->gtt_page_size = 0;
> >> +
> >> unlock:
> >> mutex_unlock(&obj->mm.lock);
> >> }
> >> @@ -2473,6 +2475,13 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> >> void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> struct sg_table *pages)
> >> {
> >> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
> >> + unsigned long supported_page_sizes = INTEL_INFO(i915)->page_size_mask;
> >> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> >> + unsigned int sg_mask = 0;
> >> + unsigned int i;
> >> + unsigned int bit;
> >> +
> >> lockdep_assert_held(&obj->mm.lock);
> >>
> >> obj->mm.get_page.sg_pos = pages->sgl;
> >> @@ -2486,6 +2495,20 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> __i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
> >> obj->mm.quirked = true;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + for_each_sg(pages->sgl, sg, pages->nents, i)
> >> + sg_mask |= sg->length;
> >> +
> >> + GEM_BUG_ON(!sg_mask);
> >> +
> >
> > This should just be obj->gtt_page_sizes = sg_mask & supported_sizes;
> But wouldn't this assume that sg->length is exactly a page size, I
> would have imagined it would be possible for shmem to give us two or
> more continuous super-pages, or am I missing something?
I'd actually report obj->mm.phys_page_sizes = sg_mask; and cook a value for
obj->mm.gtt_pages_sizes:
obj->mm.gtt_page_sizes = 0;
for_each_set_bit(bit, &i915->info.supported_gtt_pages_size) { // add salt
if (obj->mm.phys_page_sizes & ~0u << bit)
obj->mm.gtt_page_sizes |= BIT(bit);
}
Certainly for the internal objects we will have a variety of different
orders.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list