[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-fixes
Lukas Wunner
lukas at wunner.de
Sun May 28 10:08:13 UTC 2017
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 08:36:45AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org> wrote:
> > The pull is noisy because it includes -rc2.
>
> dim has you covered for this, in case you've rolled forward but Dave
> hasn't yet, you can regenerate against linus upstream branch for a
> cleaner pull (but still warn Dave ofc):
>
> $ dim pull-request drm-misc-next origin/master
Is it worth documenting this? If so, below is a suggestion.
Feel free to rephrase as you see fit.
Thanks,
Lukas
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] drm-misc: Document recommended base for -fixes pulls
Summarize the following discussion on dri-devel:
"dim has you covered for this, in case you've rolled forward but Dave
hasn't yet, you can regenerate against linus upstream branch for a
cleaner pull (but still warn Dave ofc):
$ dim pull-request drm-misc-next origin/master" (Daniel)
"FWIW this is what I've always done with drm-intel-fixes." (Jani)
"As long as I'm warned in the pull request I often fast forward to
the base if my tree is clean, just to avoid the pull request having
noise in it." (Dave)
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas at wunner.de>
---
drm-misc.rst | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drm-misc.rst b/drm-misc.rst
index d56c3c7..c66ac67 100644
--- a/drm-misc.rst
+++ b/drm-misc.rst
@@ -178,6 +178,14 @@ Maintainers mostly provide services to keep drm-misc running smoothly:
keep it current. We try to avoid backmerges for bugfix branches, and rebasing
isn't an option with multiple committers.
+* Pull requests become noisy if `-fixes` has been fast-forwarded to Linus'
+ latest -rc tag but drm-upstream hasn't done the same yet: The shortlog
+ will contain not just the queued fixes but also anything else that has
+ landed in Linus' tree in the meantime. The best practice is then to base
+ the pull request on Linus' master branch (rather than drm-upstream) by
+ setting the `upstream` argument for ``dim pull-request`` accordingly.
+ Upstream should be warned that they haven't fast-forwarded yet.
+
* During the merge-windo blackout, i.e. from -rc6 on until the merge window
closes with the release of -rc1, try to track `drm-next` with the
`-next-fixes` branch. Do not advance past -rc1, otherwise the automagic in
--
2.11.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list