[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/37] drm/exynos: Drop drm_vblank_cleanup

[Inki Dae]

Hi Daniel,

2017년 05월 24일 23:51에 Daniel Vetter 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Only in the load failure path, where the hardware is quiet anyway.
> 
> Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com>
> Cc: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim at samsung.com>
> Cc: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim at samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> index 50294a7bd29d..1c814b9342af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
>  	/* Probe non kms sub drivers and virtual display driver. */
>  	ret = exynos_drm_device_subdrv_probe(drm);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err_cleanup_vblank;
> +		goto err_unbind_all;

With this change shouldn't you post the patch to remove drm_vblank_init and setup vblank stuff in drm_crtc_init together?
I couldn't find the relevant patch on your patch series[1].

As of now, I think resource leak would happen with this patch only.

Thanks,
Inki Dae

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg142387.html

>  
>  	drm_mode_config_reset(drm);
>  
> @@ -407,8 +407,6 @@ static int exynos_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
>  	exynos_drm_fbdev_fini(drm);
>  	drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
>  	exynos_drm_device_subdrv_remove(drm);
> -err_cleanup_vblank:
> -	drm_vblank_cleanup(drm);
>  err_unbind_all:
>  	component_unbind_all(drm->dev, drm);
>  err_mode_config_cleanup:
>