[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Hold a wakeref for probing the ring registers
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue May 30 13:09:56 UTC 2017
On 30/05/2017 13:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 01:37:23PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 30/05/2017 13:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Allow intel_engine_is_idle() to be called outside of the GT wakeref by
>>> acquiring the device runtime pm for ourselves. This allows the function
>>> to act as check after we assume the engine is idle and we release the GT
>>> wakeref held whilst we have requests.
>>>
>>> [ 2613.401647] RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access
>>> [ 2613.401684] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [ 2613.401720] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 7739 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h:1787 gen6_read32+0x21f/0x2b0 [i915]
>>> [ 2613.401731] Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmi x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp snd_hda_codec_realtek coretemp snd_hda_codec_generic crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm r8169 mii mei_me lpc_ich mei prime_numbers [last unloaded: i915]
>>> [ 2613.401823] CPU: 5 PID: 7739 Comm: drv_missed_irq Tainted: G U 4.12.0-rc2-CI-CI_DRM_421+ #1
>>> [ 2613.401825] Hardware name: MSI MS-7924/Z97M-G43(MS-7924), BIOS V1.12 02/15/2016
>>> [ 2613.401840] task: ffff880409e3a740 task.stack: ffffc900084dc000
>>> [ 2613.401861] RIP: 0010:gen6_read32+0x21f/0x2b0 [i915]
>>> [ 2613.401863] RSP: 0018:ffffc900084dfce8 EFLAGS: 00010292
>>> [ 2613.401869] RAX: 000000000000002a RBX: ffff8804016a8000 RCX: 0000000000000006
>>> [ 2613.401871] RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: ffffffff81cbf2d9 RDI: ffffffff81c9e3a7
>>> [ 2613.401874] RBP: ffffc900084dfd18 R08: ffff880409e3afc8 R09: 0000000000000000
>>> [ 2613.401877] R10: 000000008a1c483f R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000000000209c
>>> [ 2613.401879] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8804016a8000 R15: ffff8804016ac150
>>> [ 2613.401882] FS: 00007f39ef3dd8c0(0000) GS:ffff88041fb40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>> [ 2613.401885] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>> [ 2613.401887] CR2: 00000000023717c8 CR3: 00000002e7b34000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
>>> [ 2613.401889] Call Trace:
>>> [ 2613.401912] intel_engine_is_idle+0x76/0x90 [i915]
>>> [ 2613.401931] i915_gem_wait_for_idle+0xe6/0x1e0 [i915]
>>> [ 2613.401951] fault_irq_set+0x40/0x90 [i915]
>>> [ 2613.401970] i915_ring_test_irq_set+0x42/0x50 [i915]
>>> [ 2613.401976] simple_attr_write+0xc7/0xe0
>>> [ 2613.401981] full_proxy_write+0x4f/0x70
>>> [ 2613.401987] __vfs_write+0x23/0x120
>>> [ 2613.401992] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x75/0x80
>>> [ 2613.401996] ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2a/0x50
>>> [ 2613.401999] ? __sb_start_write+0xfa/0x1f0
>>> [ 2613.402004] vfs_write+0xc5/0x1d0
>>> [ 2613.402008] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe7/0x1c0
>>> [ 2613.402013] SyS_write+0x44/0xb0
>>> [ 2613.402020] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1
>>> [ 2613.402022] RIP: 0033:0x7f39eded6670
>>> [ 2613.402025] RSP: 002b:00007fffdcdcb1a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
>>> [ 2613.402030] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff81470203 RCX: 00007f39eded6670
>>> [ 2613.402033] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000041bc33 RDI: 0000000000000006
>>> [ 2613.402036] RBP: ffffc900084dff88 R08: 00007f39ef3dd8c0 R09: 0000000000000001
>>> [ 2613.402038] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000041bc33
>>> [ 2613.402041] R13: 0000000000000006 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
>>> [ 2613.402046] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
>>> [ 2613.402052] Code: 01 9b fa e0 0f ff e9 28 fe ff ff 80 3d 6a dd 0e 00 00 0f 85 29 fe ff ff 48 c7 c7 48 19 29 a0 c6 05 56 dd 0e 00 01 e8 da 9a fa e0 <0f> ff e9 0f fe ff ff b9 01 00 00 00 ba 01 00 00 00 44 89 e6 48
>>> [ 2613.402199] ---[ end trace 31f0cfa93ab632bf ]---
>>>
>>> Fixes: 5400367a864d ("drm/i915: Ensure the engine is idle before manually changing HWS")
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
>>> index 413bfd8d4bf4..699f2d3861c7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
>>> @@ -1205,6 +1205,22 @@ int intel_ring_workarounds_emit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +static bool ring_is_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
>>> + bool idle = true;
>>> +
>>> + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
>>
>> I didn't find a path where this would be needed on top of the
>> previous patch. I am not objecting to making it more robust, just
>> checking if I have missed something?
>
> I don't think there is currently. I thought this was suitable
> "belt-and-braces" approach so that we could just write an assertion
> later on (ignorant of the GPU state) without causing more pain.
>
>>> + /* No bit for gen2, so assume the CS parser is idle */
>>> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) > 2 && !(I915_READ_MODE(engine) & MODE_IDLE))
>>> + idle = false;
>>
>> Could assign a logic evaluation to idle directly here but doesn't matter.
>
> Yes, but patch 3 encouraged this more convoluted approach.
Makes sense,
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list