[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 4/6] drm/i915/guc : Updating GuC and HuC firmware select function
Sujaritha
sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com
Thu Nov 2 18:21:50 UTC 2017
On 10/25/2017 08:56 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:21:23 +0200, Sujaritha Sundaresan
> <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Updating GuC and HuC firmware select function to support removing
>> i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading module parameter.
>
> Hmm, is it correct order of patches ? this modparam was already
> removed in 2/6
I will move this to be the third patch. Since the change to uc.c was
separated from 2/6,
I had included that as 3/6.
>
>>
>> v2: Clarifying the commit message (Anusha)
>>
>> v3: Unify seq_puts messages, Re-factoring code as per review (Michal)
>>
>> v4: Rebase
>>
>> v5: Separating message unification into a separate patch
>>
>> v6: Re-factoring code (Sagar, Michal)
>> Rebase
>>
>> v7: Separating from previuos patch (Sagar)
>> Rebase
>>
>> v8: Including change to intel_uc.c
>> Applying review comments (Michal)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
>> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
>> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c | 10 +++-------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 6 ++++++
>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
>> index ef67a36..b9f834f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c
>> @@ -60,10 +60,8 @@
>> * intel_guc_fw_select() - selects GuC firmware for uploading
>> *
>> * @guc: intel_guc struct
>> - *
>> - * Return: zero when we know firmware, non-zero in other case
>> */
>> -int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> +void intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
>> @@ -90,11 +88,9 @@ int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> guc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MAJOR;
>> guc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MINOR;
>> } else {
>> - DRM_ERROR("No GuC firmware known for platform with GuC!\n");
>> - return -ENOENT;
>> + DRM_ERROR("No GuC FW known for platform with GuC!\n");
>> + return;
>> }
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> }
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
>> index 023f5ba..7f6ccaf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.h
>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>> struct intel_guc;
>> -int intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc);
>> +void intel_guc_fw_select(struct intel_guc *guc);
>> int intel_guc_fw_upload(struct intel_guc *guc);
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
>> index c8a48cb..4e700ab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
>> @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ void intel_huc_select_fw(struct intel_huc *huc)
>> huc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MAJOR;
>> huc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MINOR;
>> } else {
>> - DRM_ERROR("No HuC firmware known for platform with HuC!\n");
>> + if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
>> + DRM_ERROR("No HuC FW known for platform with HuC!\n");
>> return;
>> }
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> index 9369ade..dc978a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> @@ -82,11 +82,17 @@ void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> + struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
>> + struct intel_huc *huc = &dev_priv->huc;
>
> Please run checkpatch and add separation line here
Will do.
>
>> intel_guc_init_early(&dev_priv->guc);
>
> You can now pass 'guc' as param
Will do.
>
>> + intel_guc_fw_select(guc);
>> + intel_huc_select_fw(huc);
>
> To avoid redundant checks in select_fw() functions we can
> exit earlier with
I will add the early exit condition.
Thanks for the review.
>
> if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> return;
>
>> }
>> void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> + if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
>> + return;
>> intel_uc_fw_fetch(dev_priv, &dev_priv->huc.fw);
>> intel_uc_fw_fetch(dev_priv, &dev_priv->guc.fw);
>> }
Regards,
Sujaritha
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list