[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Check if the stolen memory "reserved" area is enabled or not

[Petri Latvala]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 10:18:32AM +0200, Tomi Sarvela wrote:
> On 02/11/17 19:08, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 04:34:26PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > > 
> > > Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Check if the stolen memory "reserved" area is enabled or not
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33060/
> > > State : warning
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > 
> > > Test kms_busy:
> > >          Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-oldfb-with-reset-render-A:
> > >                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
> > >          Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-B:
> > >                  pass       -> DMESG-WARN (shard-hsw)
> > 
> > Hmm. The warn was there already AFAICS. I wonder why this is claiming
> > things were passing?
> 
> The sharded result for the run is 'warning'. What do you mean?

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6930/shards.html

The comparison is done to CI_DRM_3309 according to this, and
kms_busy at extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-B was
dmesg-warn there. Why is the above diff showing pass -> DMESG-WARN?



-- 
Petri Latvala