[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Check if the stolen memory "reserved" area is enabled or not

Tomi Sarvela tomi.p.sarvela at intel.com
Fri Nov 3 12:53:48 UTC 2017


On 03/11/17 13:33, Tomi Sarvela wrote:
> On 03/11/17 12:43, Petri Latvala wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 10:18:32AM +0200, Tomi Sarvela wrote:
>>> On 02/11/17 19:08, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 04:34:26PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
>>>>> == Series Details ==
>>>>>
>>>>> Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Check if the stolen 
>>>>> memory "reserved" area is enabled or not
>>>>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33060/
>>>>> State : warning
>>>>>
>>>>> == Summary ==
>>>>>
>>>>> Test kms_busy:
>>>>>           Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-oldfb-with-reset-render-A:
>>>>>                   dmesg-warn -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
>>>>>           Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-B:
>>>>>                   pass       -> DMESG-WARN (shard-hsw)
>>>>
>>>> Hmm. The warn was there already AFAICS. I wonder why this is claiming
>>>> things were passing?
>>>
>>> The sharded result for the run is 'warning'. What do you mean?
>>
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6930/shards.html
>>
>> The comparison is done to CI_DRM_3309 according to this, and
>> kms_busy at extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-B was
>> dmesg-warn there. Why is the above diff showing pass -> DMESG-WARN?
> 
> Found the reason: some of the shards have been run twice for CI_DRM_3309 
> (my mistake, probably). This has the unintended effect on visualization 
> / comparison which create independently: results depends on loading 
> order if there's flip-flops, and differences might show up.
> 
> I'll remove duplicate shards and re-run the html.

Cleaned up CI_DRM_3309 run. Sorry for the confusion.

Made the improvement of dropping hosts without needed runs when asking 
for changes: there is no comparable changes if one of two runs is 
missing. They can be seen in shards-all.html though.

Re-ran Patchwork_6930 as an example: (SUCCESS)

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6930/shards.html
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6930/shards-all.html

Test kms_flip:
         Subgroup plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible:
                 pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#100368
Test kms_busy:
         Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-oldfb-with-reset-render-A:
                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (shard-hsw)

fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368

shard-hsw        total:2539 pass:1431 dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:9 
skip:1097 time:9313s


Tomi
-- 
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list