[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Include engine state on detecting a missed breadcrumb/seqno
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Nov 9 11:39:58 UTC 2017
Now that we have a common engine state pretty printer, we can use that
instead of the adhoc information printed when we miss a breadcrumb.
v2: Rearrange intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs() to avoid calling
intel_engine_dump() under the rb spinlock (Mika) and to pretty-print the
error state early so that we include the full list of waiters.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index 43cf227a51c2..918641a7c3f3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -64,12 +64,11 @@ static unsigned long wait_timeout(void)
static noinline void missed_breadcrumb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s missed breadcrumb at %pS, irq posted? %s, current seqno=%x, last=%x\n",
- engine->name, __builtin_return_address(0),
- yesno(test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB,
- &engine->irq_posted)),
- intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
- intel_engine_last_submit(engine));
+ struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(__func__);
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s missed breadcrumb at %pS\n",
+ engine->name, __builtin_return_address(0));
+ intel_engine_dump(engine, &p);
set_bit(engine->id, &engine->i915->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings);
}
@@ -207,12 +206,16 @@ void intel_engine_unpin_breadcrumbs_irq(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
void intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
- struct intel_wait *wait, *n, *first;
+ struct intel_wait *wait, *n;
if (!b->irq_armed)
return;
- /* We only disarm the irq when we are idle (all requests completed),
+ if (intel_engine_wakeup(engine) & ENGINE_WAKEUP_ASLEEP)
+ missed_breadcrumb(engine);
+
+ /*
+ * We only disarm the irq when we are idle (all requests completed),
* so if the bottom-half remains asleep, it missed the request
* completion.
*/
@@ -220,15 +223,14 @@ void intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
spin_lock(&b->irq_lock);
- first = fetch_and_zero(&b->irq_wait);
+ b->irq_wait = NULL;
if (b->irq_armed)
__intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(engine);
spin_unlock(&b->irq_lock);
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(wait, n, &b->waiters, node) {
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&wait->node);
- if (wake_up_process(wait->tsk) && wait == first)
- missed_breadcrumb(engine);
+ wake_up_process(wait->tsk);
}
b->waiters = RB_ROOT;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index 403cc4749008..1846c55afef5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -1878,6 +1878,12 @@ void intel_engine_dump(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct drm_printer *m)
}
spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
+ drm_printf(m, "IRQ? 0x%lx (breadcrumbs? %s) (execlists? %s)\n",
+ engine->irq_posted,
+ yesno(test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB,
+ &engine->irq_posted)),
+ yesno(test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST,
+ &engine->irq_posted)));
drm_printf(m, "Idle? %s\n", yesno(intel_engine_is_idle(engine)));
drm_printf(m, "\n");
}
--
2.15.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list