[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915: Pass crtc_state to ips toggle functions
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Nov 9 17:51:06 UTC 2017
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 09-11-17 om 18:09 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:24:55PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c | 4 ++--
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 +++---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 4 ++--
> >> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> >> index b8315bca852b..c6373febf617 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> >> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void haswell_load_luts(struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> */
> >> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && intel_crtc_state->ips_enabled &&
> >> (intel_crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_SPLIT)) {
> >> - hsw_disable_ips(intel_crtc);
> >> + hsw_disable_ips(intel_crtc, intel_crtc_state);
> > I would suggest simplifying more and passing only the state.
> > The callee can always dig out the crtc if it needs it.
> >
> >> reenable_ips = true;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void haswell_load_luts(struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> i9xx_load_luts(crtc_state);
> >>
> >> if (reenable_ips)
> >> - hsw_enable_ips(intel_crtc);
> >> + hsw_enable_ips(intel_crtc, intel_crtc_state);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void bdw_load_degamma_lut(struct drm_crtc_state *state)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> index f5933b0719c9..13b372e4f06e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -4832,12 +4832,12 @@ static void ironlake_pfit_enable(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void hsw_enable_ips(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> >> +void hsw_enable_ips(struct intel_crtc *crtc, const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> {
> >> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >>
> >> - if (!crtc->config->ips_enabled)
> >> + if (!crtc_state->ips_enabled)
> >> return;
> >>
> >> /*
> >> @@ -4871,12 +4871,12 @@ void hsw_enable_ips(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void hsw_disable_ips(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> >> +void hsw_disable_ips(struct intel_crtc *crtc, const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> {
> >> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >>
> >> - if (!crtc->config->ips_enabled)
> >> + if (!crtc_state->ips_enabled)
> >> return;
> >>
> >> assert_plane_enabled(dev_priv, crtc->plane);
> > Hmm. Confusied. Oh right, my plane assert cleanup didn't manage to go in yet :P
> >
> >> @@ -4924,7 +4924,8 @@ static void intel_crtc_dpms_overlay_disable(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> >> * completely hide the primary plane.
> >> */
> >> static void
> >> -intel_post_enable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> +intel_post_enable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >> + const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> >> {
> >> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >> @@ -4937,7 +4938,7 @@ intel_post_enable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> * when going from primary only to sprite only and vice
> >> * versa.
> >> */
> >> - hsw_enable_ips(intel_crtc);
> >> + hsw_enable_ips(intel_crtc, new_crtc_state);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Gen2 reports pipe underruns whenever all planes are disabled.
> >> @@ -4956,7 +4957,8 @@ intel_post_enable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >>
> >> /* FIXME move all this to pre_plane_update() with proper state tracking */
> >> static void
> >> -intel_pre_disable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> +intel_pre_disable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >> + const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> >> {
> >> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >> @@ -4978,7 +4980,7 @@ intel_pre_disable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> * when going from primary only to sprite only and vice
> >> * versa.
> >> */
> >> - hsw_disable_ips(intel_crtc);
> >> + hsw_disable_ips(intel_crtc, old_crtc_state);
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* FIXME get rid of this and use pre_plane_update */
> >> @@ -4990,7 +4992,7 @@ intel_pre_disable_primary_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> >> int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> >>
> >> - intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc);
> >> + intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc, to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state));
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Vblank time updates from the shadow to live plane control register
> >> @@ -5034,7 +5036,7 @@ static void intel_post_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> >> if (primary_state->base.visible &&
> >> (needs_modeset(&pipe_config->base) ||
> >> !old_primary_state->base.visible))
> >> - intel_post_enable_primary(&crtc->base);
> >> + intel_post_enable_primary(&crtc->base, pipe_config);
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -5063,7 +5065,7 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> >>
> >> if (old_primary_state->base.visible &&
> >> (modeset || !primary_state->base.visible))
> >> - intel_pre_disable_primary(&crtc->base);
> >> + intel_pre_disable_primary(&crtc->base, old_crtc_state);
> >> }
> >>
> >> /*
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> index cddd96b24878..82c33d9cd466 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> @@ -3947,7 +3947,7 @@ static int intel_dp_sink_crc_stop(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >> }
> >>
> >> out:
> >> - hsw_enable_ips(intel_crtc);
> >> + hsw_enable_ips(intel_crtc, to_intel_crtc_state(intel_crtc->base.state));
> > crtc->config would seem like the slightly more correct thing to pass
> > here. It's also easier to grep for when someone sets out to fix this
> > mess properly.
> Considered it, but our crtc->config usage is a mess. I'd rather get rid of the intel_dp_sink_crc code tbh. :/
I'd rather not spread more ->state uses when I just recently
managed to clean out many of them. We still have some left for
sure, but adding more seems like going backwards.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list