[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Move irqs enabled assertion deeper for mock breadcrumbs

[Chris Wilson]

In order to allow the mock breadcrumbs tests to run without device irqs
being enabled, move the intel_irqs_enabled() assert deeper to just
before we commit to enabling the HW irq.

v2: Add a FIXME explaining that placing the assertion so deep is not
ideal, but a compromise for mock breadcrumbs.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld at gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171107102003.1802-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index 4de054f8c1ba..4c4fbf5f20f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -145,6 +145,14 @@ static void intel_breadcrumbs_fake_irq(struct timer_list *t)
 
 static void irq_enable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: Ideally we want this on the API boundary, but for the
+	 * sake of testing with mock breadcrumbs (no HW so unable to
+	 * enable irqs) we place it deep within the bowels, at the point
+	 * of no return.
+	 */
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(engine->i915));
+
 	/* Enabling the IRQ may miss the generation of the interrupt, but
 	 * we still need to force the barrier before reading the seqno,
 	 * just in case.
@@ -266,8 +274,6 @@ static bool __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
 	bool enabled;
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(i915));
-
 	lockdep_assert_held(&b->irq_lock);
 	if (b->irq_armed)
 		return false;
-- 
2.15.0