[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Implement ReadHitWriteOnlyDisable.

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Nov 10 21:21:51 UTC 2017


Quoting Rafael Antognolli (2017-11-03 18:30:27)
> The workaround for this is described as:
> 
> "if RenderSurfaceState.Num_Multisamples > 1, disable RCC clock gating if
> RenderSurfaceState.Num_Multisamples == 1, set 0x7010[14] = 1"
> 
> Further documentation in the internal bug referenced by the bspec
> suggest that any of the above suggestions should suffice to fix the
> issue. We are going with disabling RCC clock gating.
> 
> Unfortunately, what we are doing doesn't match the name of the
> workaround, but at least it matches its description.
> 
> This change improves CNL stability by avoiding some of the hangs seen in
> the platform.
> 
> v2: Only disable RCC clock gating.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h        | 1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 +++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 8c775e96b4e4..bd36ec9bc93f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -3837,6 +3837,7 @@ enum {
>   */
>  #define SLICE_UNIT_LEVEL_CLKGATE       _MMIO(0x94d4)
>  #define  SARBUNIT_CLKGATE_DIS          (1 << 5)
> +#define  RCCUNIT_CLKGATE_DIS           (1 << 7)
>  
>  /*
>   * Display engine regs
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index f31f2d6384c3..3af0dcb91e9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -1320,6 +1320,9 @@ static int cnl_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>         WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(GEN8_CS_CHICKEN1, GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_LEVEL_MASK,
>                             GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_COMMAND_LEVEL);
>  
> +       /* ReadHitWriteOnlyDisable: cnl */
> +       WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(SLICE_UNIT_LEVEL_CLKGATE, RCCUNIT_CLKGATE_DIS);

This is not sticking. Why are we applying SLICE_UNIT_LEVEL_CLKGATE as a
context register here, and as an ordinary unmasked register over in
cnl_init_clock_gating() ?
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list