[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Yet another forgotten mock_i915->mm initialiser
Matthew Auld
matthew.william.auld at gmail.com
Fri Nov 10 23:18:41 UTC 2017
On 10 November 2017 at 22:58, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Move all of the i915->mm initialisation to a private function that can
> be reused by the mock i915 device to save forgetting any more steps.
>
> For example,
> <7>[ 1542.046332] [IGT] drv_selftest: starting subtest mock_objects
> <4>[ 1542.123924] Setting dangerous option mock_selftests - tainting kernel
> <6>[ 1542.167941] i915: Performing mock selftests with st_random_seed=0x246f5ab5 st_timeout=1000
> <4>[ 1542.178012] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> <4>[ 1542.178027] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> <4>[ 1542.178032] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> <4>[ 1542.178041] CPU: 3 PID: 6008 Comm: kworker/3:7 Tainted: G U 4.14.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_3332+ #1
> <4>[ 1542.178049] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0040.2017.0619.1722 06/19/2017
> <4>[ 1542.178144] Workqueue: events __i915_gem_free_work [i915]
> <4>[ 1542.178152] Call Trace:
> <4>[ 1542.178163] dump_stack+0x68/0x9f
> <4>[ 1542.178170] register_lock_class+0x3fd/0x580
> <4>[ 1542.178177] ? unwind_next_frame+0x14/0x20
> <4>[ 1542.178184] ? __save_stack_trace+0x73/0xd0
> <4>[ 1542.178191] __lock_acquire+0xa4/0x1b00
> <4>[ 1542.178254] ? __i915_gem_free_work+0x28/0xa0 [i915]
> <4>[ 1542.178261] ? __lock_acquire+0x4ab/0x1b00
> <4>[ 1542.178268] lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
> <4>[ 1542.178273] ? lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
> <4>[ 1542.178336] ? __i915_gem_free_work+0x28/0xa0 [i915]
> <4>[ 1542.178344] _raw_spin_lock+0x32/0x50
> <4>[ 1542.178405] ? __i915_gem_free_work+0x28/0xa0 [i915]
> <4>[ 1542.178468] __i915_gem_free_work+0x28/0xa0 [i915]
> <4>[ 1542.178476] process_one_work+0x221/0x650
> <4>[ 1542.178483] worker_thread+0x4e/0x3c0
> <4>[ 1542.178489] kthread+0x114/0x150
> <4>[ 1542.178494] ? process_one_work+0x650/0x650
> <4>[ 1542.178499] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
> <4>[ 1542.178506] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 8 +-------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 80963c81c2ca..351247b49c79 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -5233,6 +5233,21 @@ i915_gem_load_init_fences(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> i915_gem_detect_bit_6_swizzle(dev_priv);
> }
>
> +static void i915_gem_init_mm(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + spin_lock_init(&i915->mm.obj_lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&i915->mm.free_lock);
> +
> + init_llist_head(&i915->mm.free_list);
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&i915->mm.unbound_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&i915->mm.bound_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&i915->mm.fence_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&i915->mm.userfault_list);
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&i915->mm.free_work, __i915_gem_free_work);
> +}
> +
> int
> i915_gem_load_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> @@ -5274,15 +5289,7 @@ i915_gem_load_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> if (err)
> goto err_priorities;
>
> - INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->mm.free_work, __i915_gem_free_work);
> -
> - spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mm.obj_lock);
> - spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mm.free_lock);
> - init_llist_head(&dev_priv->mm.free_list);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.unbound_list);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.bound_list);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.userfault_list);
> + i915_gem_init_mm(dev_priv);
>
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev_priv->gt.retire_work,
> i915_gem_retire_work_handler);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> index d2bf2729c331..2df47239e8a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> @@ -179,9 +179,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private *mock_gem_device(void)
> I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K |
> I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M;
>
> - spin_lock_init(&i915->mm.object_stat_lock);
I think we still need this, no?
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list