[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/guc: Update name and prototype of GuC submission related functions

[Michal Wajdeczko]

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:27:26 +0100, Chris Wilson  
<chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-11-14 18:19:01)
>>
>>
>> On 11/14/2017 5:53 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:48:11 +0100, Sagar Arun Kamble
>> > <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com> wrote:
>> >> -static void i915_guc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
>> >> +static void intel_guc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
>> >
>> > and verbose "guc_submission_handler()" ?
>> >
>> Yes. Should we rename irq_tasklet to submission_tasklet?
>> then we can s/intel_lrc_irq_handler/execlists_submission_tasklet and
>> s/i915_guc_irq_handler/guc_submission_tasklet.
>> Again trying to maintain the nomenclature consistency for Execlists and  
>> GuC.
>
> Ok. Do that as a separate (initial) step.

Hmm. By "tasklet" I usually think of "tasklet_struct". Then
"guc_submission_tasklet" suggests that this is another kind
or customized "tasklet" struct. So maybe use full name:

s/i915_guc_irq_handler/guc_submission_tasklet_func ?