[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:54AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> No functional change. Just starting the wrpll fixes
>> with a clean-up to make units a bit more clear.
>> 
>> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
>> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
>> index 61c684ac47af..db7afd314462 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
>> @@ -2198,11 +2198,11 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params, uint32_t
>>  }
>>  
>>  static bool
>> -cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock /* in Hz */,
>
> Now the clock sent is already in KHz, should we have that in the comment either
> in the argument or afe_clock calculation? 
> Apart from this nitpick, looks good.

We use kHz for clocks all over the place, IMO only any deviation from
that needs to be documented.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
>  
>> +cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>>  			struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
>>  {
>> -	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5 / KHz(1); /* clocks in kHz */
>> +	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5;
>>  	unsigned int dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
>>  	unsigned int dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
>>  	unsigned int dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
>> @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>  
>>  	cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_HDMI_MODE;
>>  
>> -	if (!cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock * 1000, dev_priv, &wrpll_params))
>> +	if (!cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock, dev_priv, &wrpll_params))
>>  		return false;
>>  
>>  	cfgcr0 |= DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(wrpll_params.dco_fraction) |
>> -- 
>> 2.13.6
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center