[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Declare we allocated the guc clients
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Nov 20 21:59:12 UTC 2017
Quoting Michel Thierry (2017-11-20 21:52:06)
> On 11/20/2017 1:19 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Silence sparse over
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_guc.c:135 igt_guc_init_doorbell_hw() error: we previously assumed 'guc->execbuf_client' could be null (see line 123)
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_guc.c:142 igt_guc_init_doorbell_hw() error: we previously assumed 'guc->preempt_client' could be null (see line 123)
> >
> > by asserting that we did succeed in creating the pair of clients for
> > testing.
> >
>
> Sparse isn't smart enough to see what guc_clients_destroy/_create do.
Oops, not sparse but smatch. Yeah, it doesn't inline as aggressively as
gcc (if that's the right explanation). I'm also not sure if the pattern
it enforces is a great pattern; but it certainly helps curb the
antipatterns so keeping it clean does help with code quality. (So
overall quite a useful little static analyser.)
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list