[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/perf_pmu: Protect macro args
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 22 20:05:33 UTC 2017
On 22/11/2017 19:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In particular we fix the evaluation of "(double)x" when x is a compound.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index b8422211..5d5f2b30 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ static void pmu_read_multi(int fd, unsigned int num, uint64_t *val)
> }
>
> #define assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance) \
> - igt_assert_f((double)(x) <= (1.0 + tolerance) * (double)ref && \
> - (double)(x) >= (1.0 - tolerance) * (double)ref, \
> + igt_assert_f((double)(x) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(ref) && \
> + (double)(x) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(ref), \
> "'%s' != '%s' (%f not within %f%% tolerance of %f)\n",\
> - #x, #ref, (double)x, tolerance * 100.0, (double)ref)
> + #x, #ref, (double)(x), (tolerance) * 100.0, (double)ref)
>
> /*
> * Helper for cases where we assert on time spent sleeping (directly or
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list