[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: export the stolen region as a resource

[Joonas Lahtinen]

+ Dave as a heads-up

On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 07:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > We duplicate the stolen discovery code in early-quirks and in i915,
> > however if we just export the region as a resource from early-quirks we
> > can nuke the duplication.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> > Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: x86 at kernel.org
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c         |   6 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c    |  51 +--------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 109 +--------------------------------
> >  include/drm/i915_drm.h                 |   3 +
> >  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
> 
> If it's truly identical:
> 
>   Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>

Are you fine with us merging this together with the rest of the series
through the DRM tree once it's all reviewed?

That'd help not requiring so many backmerges.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation