[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/perf_pmu: Combine rc6/rc6p tests

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Nov 24 08:50:49 UTC 2017


On 23/11/2017 15:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When in rc6p, rc6 doesn't increment. So on rc6p machines, we can't test
> rc6 in isolation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/perf_pmu.c | 50 +++++---------------------------------------------
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index b8800e61..1e441e0e 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -998,45 +998,10 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
>   
>   static void
>   test_rc6(int gem_fd)
> -{
> -	int64_t duration_ns = 2e9;
> -	uint64_t idle, busy, prev;
> -	unsigned int slept;
> -	int fd, fw;
> -
> -	fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY);
> -
> -	gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
> -	usleep(100e3); /* wait for the rc6 cycle counter to kick in */
> -
> -	/* Go idle and check full RC6. */
> -	prev = pmu_read_single(fd);
> -	slept = measured_usleep(duration_ns / 1000);
> -	idle = pmu_read_single(fd);
> -
> -	assert_within_epsilon(idle - prev, slept, tolerance);
> -
> -	/* Wake up device and check no RC6. */
> -	fw = igt_open_forcewake_handle(gem_fd);
> -	igt_assert(fw >= 0);
> -	usleep(1e3); /* wait for the rc6 cycle counter to stop ticking */
> -
> -	prev = pmu_read_single(fd);
> -	usleep(duration_ns / 1000);
> -	busy = pmu_read_single(fd);
> -
> -	close(fw);
> -	close(fd);
> -
> -	assert_within_epsilon(busy - prev, 0.0, tolerance);
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -test_rc6p(int gem_fd)
>   {
>   	int64_t duration_ns = 2e9;
>   	unsigned int num_pmu = 1;
> -	uint64_t idle[3], busy[3], prev[3];
> +	uint64_t idle[3], busy[3], prev[3], total;
>   	unsigned int slept, i;
>   	int fd, ret, fw;
>   
> @@ -1048,8 +1013,7 @@ test_rc6p(int gem_fd)
>   		if (ret > 0)
>   			num_pmu++;
>   	}
> -
> -	igt_require(num_pmu == 3);
> +	igt_require(num_pmu >= 1);
>   
>   	gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
>   	usleep(100e3); /* wait for the rc6 cycle counter to kick in */
> @@ -1059,8 +1023,10 @@ test_rc6p(int gem_fd)
>   	slept = measured_usleep(duration_ns / 1000);
>   	pmu_read_multi(fd, num_pmu, idle);
>   
> +	total = 0;
>   	for (i = 0; i < num_pmu; i++)
> -		assert_within_epsilon(idle[i] - prev[i], slept, tolerance);
> +		total += idle[i] - prev[i];
> +	assert_within_epsilon(total, slept, tolerance);
>   
>   	/* Wake up device and check no RC6. */
>   	fw = igt_open_forcewake_handle(gem_fd);
> @@ -1217,12 +1183,6 @@ igt_main
>   	igt_subtest("rc6")
>   		test_rc6(fd);
>   
> -	/**
> -	 * Test RC6p residency reporting.
> -	 */
> -	igt_subtest("rc6p")
> -		test_rc6p(fd);
> -
>   	/**
>   	 * Check render nodes are counted.
>   	 */
> 

You don't think it is worth keeping the single counter rc6 test and only 
modify the rc6p? From a point of view of separately testing different 
code paths within the implementation.

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list